MetaCap

Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund (NVG) vs PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund (PCQ)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (7.0x vs 11.7x for Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund). Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (9.10% vs 5.61%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

NVG versus PCQ key metrics
MetricNVGPCQ
Share price$10.42$7.70
Market cap$2.25B—
1-day change-1.70%-0.77%
P/E ratio (TTM)11.717.00
EPS (TTM)$0.89$1.10
Dividend yield9.10%5.61%
Annual dividend$0.948$0.432
52-week high$13.59$9.19
52-week low$10.29$7.57
Distance from 52-week high-23.33%-16.21%
Average volume820.45K181.28K
Shares outstanding215.82M—
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (11.7x vs 7.0x trailing P/E).
  • Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.10% vs 5.61%).

NVG vs PCQ FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, NVG or PCQ?

PCQ has the lower trailing P/E at 7.0, versus 11.7 for NVG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund or PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund?

Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund has the higher yield at 9.10%, compared with 5.61% for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund.

Are Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund and PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons