Nayax (NYAX) vs Quantum Computing (QUBT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Nayax (NYAX) has outperformed Quantum Computing (QUBT) over the past year, losing 7.8% versus a loss of 64.2%. Nayax is the larger company by market cap ($1.70 billion vs $1.67 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Quantum Computing is growing revenue faster (+82.8% vs +27.5%). Nayax converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.9% versus -2738.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NYAX | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $45.49 | $7.38 |
| Market cap | $1.70B | $1.67B |
| 1-day change | +0.13% | -0.94% |
| YTD return | -10.22% | -27.39% |
| 1-year return | -7.81% | -64.22% |
| 5-year return | — | +29.79% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 216.62 | — |
| Forward P/E | 29.07 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.21 | $-0.05 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $400.43M | $682.00K |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +27.52% | +82.84% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $35.52M | $-18.67M |
| Gross margin | 48.19% | 9.82% |
| Operating margin | 9.38% | -7489.30% |
| Net margin | 8.87% | -2738.12% |
| 52-week high | $76.86 | $23.79 |
| 52-week low | $39.17 | $6.18 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -40.81% | -68.98% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +67.07% | +152.98% |
| Average volume | 24.85K | 7.79M |
| Shares outstanding | 37.38M | 226.35M |
| Employees | 1,200 | 72 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- NYAX has outperformed QUBT by 56.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Nayax is more profitable, keeping 8.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -2738.1 cents for Quantum Computing.
- Quantum Computing grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+82.84% vs +27.52%).
About Nayax
NYAX stock →Nayax Ltd., a fintech company, designs, develops, and sells integrated POS devices and software for automated self-service customers in-house in the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, Israel, and the rest of the world. It offers POS, cashless payments, and charging stations, such as VPOS Touch, Onyx, Nova Market, DOT, Nova C4, Nova C3, EV-Meter, EV Kiosk, Nova 55F, Nova 22", Nova 156, Nova Modu, and Nova Kiosk; management suite and telemetry solutions, Nayax Core Management Suite, MoMa, Vending Management System, Nayax Energy Core, and Retail Management Cloud; marketing, loyalty, and consumer engagement platforms, such as Monyx Wallet and Weezmo; payments and integrations solutions, including API Suite and Coinbridge.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 1,200 employees
About Quantum Computing
QUBT stock →Quantum Computing Inc., an integrated photonics company, provides quantum machines to commercial and government markets in the United States. The company develops thin-film lithium niobate chips for optical devices, such as electro-optical modulators, periodically poled devices for frequency conversion, and micro-ring resonator cavities markets.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 72 employees
NYAX vs QUBT FAQ
Which is bigger, Nayax or Quantum Computing?
Nayax (NYAX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.70B compared with $1.67B for Quantum Computing (QUBT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NYAX or QUBT?
NYAX returned -7.81% over the past 12 months, compared with -64.22% for QUBT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Nayax and Quantum Computing in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry within the Technology sector.