MetaCap

Open Text (OTEX) vs Parsons (PSN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Open Text (OTEX) has outperformed Parsons (PSN) over the past year, losing 39.9% versus a loss of 51.8%. Over five years, PSN leads with a +18.9% price change compared with -53.6% for OTEX. Open Text is the larger company by market cap ($5.64 billion vs $4.59 billion), about 1.2 times the size.

On valuation, Open Text trades at a lower forward P/E (5.5x vs 12.6x for Parsons). Open Text pays a dividend yielding 4.73%, while Parsons does not currently pay one. Open Text converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.3% versus 3.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

OTEX-39.86%PSN-51.82%
+6%-26%-58%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
OTEX-52.73%PSN+23.62%
+238%+83%-72%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

OTEX versus PSN key metrics
MetricOTEXPSN
Share price$23.24$43.02
Market cap$5.64B$4.59B
1-day change+0.43%+2.38%
YTD return-28.67%-30.39%
1-year return-39.86%-51.82%
5-year return-53.56%+18.94%
P/E ratio (TTM)9.0129.67
Forward P/E5.4612.57
EPS (TTM)$2.58$1.45
Dividend yield4.73%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.10$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$5.25B$6.36B
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.51%-5.72%
Net income (latest FY)$643.02M$241.14M
Gross margin73.74%22.49%
Operating margin20.64%6.57%
Net margin12.26%3.79%
52-week high$39.90$88.00
52-week low$19.78$36.26
Distance from 52-week high-41.75%-51.11%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+20.27%+36.52%
Average volume1.47M1.41M
Shares outstanding242.66M106.81M
Employees19,90021,000
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryEDP ServicesEDP Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • OTEX has outperformed PSN by 12.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Parsons trades at a higher earnings multiple (29.7x vs 9.0x trailing P/E).
  • Open Text offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.73% vs 0.00%).
  • Open Text is more profitable, keeping 12.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.8 cents for Parsons.
  • Open Text grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+1.51% vs -5.72%).

About Open Text

OTEX stock →

Open Text Corporation provides data management solutions for enterprise AI in North, Central and South America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Australia, Japan, Singapore, India, and China. Its products and solutions help organizations collect, connect, contextualize, protect, govern, use, and secure data across their operations.

Technology · EDP Services · 19,900 employees

About Parsons

PSN stock →

Parsons Corporation provides design, engineering and technical services, and smart and agile software for the United States federal government and critical infrastructure customers worldwide. It operates through Federal Solutions and Critical Infrastructure segments.

Technology · EDP Services · 21,000 employees

OTEX vs PSN FAQ

Which is bigger, Open Text or Parsons?

Open Text (OTEX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.64B compared with $4.59B for Parsons (PSN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, OTEX or PSN?

OTEX returned -39.86% over the past 12 months, compared with -51.82% for PSN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, OTEX or PSN?

OTEX has the lower trailing P/E at 9.0, versus 29.7 for PSN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Open Text or Parsons?

Open Text pays a dividend yielding 4.73%, while Parsons does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Open Text and Parsons in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the EDP Services industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons