PACS Group (PACS) vs Universal Health Services (UHS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
PACS Group (PACS) has outperformed Universal Health Services (UHS) over the past year, gaining 230.5% versus a loss of 12.0%. Universal Health Services is the larger company by market cap ($10.45 billion vs $6.86 billion), about 1.5 times the size, while PACS Group is growing revenue faster (+29.3% vs +9.7%). On valuation, Universal Health Services trades at a lower forward P/E (7.4x vs 15.9x for PACS Group).
Universal Health Services pays a dividend yielding 0.45%, while PACS Group does not currently pay one. Universal Health Services converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus 3.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PACS | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $43.30 | $177.35 |
| Market cap | $6.86B | $10.45B |
| 1-day change | -0.98% | +0.93% |
| YTD return | +12.79% | -18.65% |
| 1-year return | +230.53% | -12.03% |
| 5-year return | — | +33.33% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 25.62 | 7.23 |
| Forward P/E | 15.85 | 7.40 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.69 | $24.52 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.45% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.80 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.29B | $17.36B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +29.32% | +9.71% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $191.54M | $1.49B |
| Gross margin | 21.92% | — |
| Operating margin | 5.85% | 11.48% |
| Net margin | 3.62% | 8.57% |
| 52-week high | $49.49 | $246.33 |
| 52-week low | $10.31 | $140.08 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.51% | -28.00% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +36.26% | +9.92% |
| Average volume | 804.84K | 794.98K |
| Shares outstanding | 158.34M | 51.69M |
| Employees | 47,455 | 102,000 |
| Sector | Health Care | Health Care |
| Industry | Hospital/Nursing Management | Hospital/Nursing Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PACS has outperformed UHS by 242.6 percentage points over the past year.
- PACS Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (25.6x vs 7.2x trailing P/E).
- PACS Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+29.32% vs +9.71%).
About PACS Group
PACS stock →PACS Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities in the United States. It also provides senior care and independent living facilities.
Health Care · Hospital/Nursing Management · 47,455 employees
About Universal Health Services
UHS stock →Universal Health Services, Inc., through its subsidiaries, owns and operates acute care hospitals, and outpatient and behavioral health care facilities in the United States. It operates through Acute Care Hospital Services and Behavioral Health Care Services segments.
Health Care · Hospital/Nursing Management · 102,000 employees
PACS vs UHS FAQ
Which is bigger, PACS Group or Universal Health Services?
Universal Health Services (UHS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.45B compared with $6.86B for PACS Group (PACS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PACS or UHS?
PACS returned +230.53% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.03% for UHS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PACS or UHS?
UHS has the lower trailing P/E at 7.2, versus 25.6 for PACS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, PACS Group or Universal Health Services?
Universal Health Services pays a dividend yielding 0.45%, while PACS Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are PACS Group and Universal Health Services in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Hospital/Nursing Management industry within the Health Care sector.