PBF Energy (PBF) vs Phillips 66 (PSX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
PBF Energy (PBF) has outperformed Phillips 66 (PSX) over the past year, gaining 178.3% versus a gain of 105.0%. Over five years, PBF leads with a +433.7% price change compared with +234.4% for PSX. Phillips 66 is the larger company by market cap ($108.90 billion vs $9.92 billion), about 11.0 times the size.
On valuation, PBF Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (4.8x vs 10.2x for Phillips 66). Phillips 66 offers the higher dividend yield (1.82% vs 1.31%). Phillips 66 converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.3% versus -0.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PBF | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $83.68 | $271.62 |
| Market cap | $9.92B | $108.90B |
| 1-day change | +0.97% | +0.68% |
| YTD return | +207.82% | +110.32% |
| 1-year return | +178.27% | +105.03% |
| 5-year return | +433.67% | +234.43% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.37 | 15.52 |
| Forward P/E | 4.80 | 10.18 |
| EPS (TTM) | $11.36 | $17.50 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.82% |
| Annual dividend | $1.10 | $4.94 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $29.33B | $132.38B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -11.42% | -7.53% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-158.50M | $4.40B |
| Gross margin | -1.95% | 12.30% |
| Operating margin | -0.19% | — |
| Net margin | -0.54% | 3.33% |
| 52-week high | $85.75 | $277.12 |
| 52-week low | $25.62 | $126.74 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -2.41% | -1.98% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -7.98% | -5.32% |
| Average volume | 3.36M | 2.87M |
| Shares outstanding | 118.54M | 400.94M |
| Employees | 3,678 | 12,600 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Integrated oil Companies | Integrated oil Companies |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Phillips 66 is about 11.0 times larger than PBF Energy by market value ($108.90B vs $9.92B).
- PBF has outperformed PSX by 73.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Phillips 66 trades at a higher earnings multiple (15.5x vs 7.4x trailing P/E).
About PBF Energy
PBF stock →PBF Energy Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the refining and supplying of petroleum products. It operates through two segments, Refining and Logistics.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 3,678 employees
About Phillips 66
PSX stock →Phillips 66 operates as an integrated downstream energy provider in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and internationally. It operates through five segments: Midstream, Chemicals, Refining, Marketing and Specialties (M&S), and Renewable Fuels.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 12,600 employees
PBF vs PSX FAQ
Which is bigger, PBF Energy or Phillips 66?
Phillips 66 (PSX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $108.90B compared with $9.92B for PBF Energy (PBF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PBF or PSX?
PBF returned +178.27% over the past 12 months, compared with +105.03% for PSX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PBF or PSX?
PBF has the lower trailing P/E at 7.4, versus 15.5 for PSX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBF Energy or Phillips 66?
Phillips 66 has the higher yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.31% for PBF Energy.
Are PBF Energy and Phillips 66 in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated oil Companies industry within the Energy sector.