PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) vs Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has outperformed PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) over the past year, losing 11.7% versus a loss of 16.5%. Over five years, RQI leads with a -30.9% price change compared with -45.0% for PDO. PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund is the larger company by market cap ($1.72 billion vs $1.47 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (6.7x vs 8.8x for PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund). Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund pays a dividend yielding 9.31%, while PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PDO | RQI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $11.85 | $10.96 |
| Market cap | $1.72B | $1.47B |
| 1-day change | -1.90% | -1.08% |
| YTD return | -14.38% | -4.03% |
| 1-year return | -16.55% | -11.68% |
| 5-year return | -45.01% | -30.94% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.78 | 6.72 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.35 | $1.63 |
| Dividend yield | 12.95% | 9.31% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.02 |
| 52-week high | $14.25 | $13.57 |
| 52-week low | $11.51 | $10.81 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.84% | -19.23% |
| Average volume | 928.81K | 684.98K |
| Shares outstanding | 144.83M | 134.52M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable | Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.8x vs 6.7x trailing P/E).
- PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (12.95% vs 9.31%).
About Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
RQI stock →Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched by Cohen & Steers, Inc.
Finance · Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable
PDO vs RQI FAQ
Which is bigger, PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund or Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund?
PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.72B compared with $1.47B for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PDO or RQI?
RQI returned -11.68% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.55% for PDO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PDO or RQI?
RQI has the lower trailing P/E at 6.7, versus 8.8 for PDO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund or Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund?
PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund has the higher yield at 12.95%, compared with 9.31% for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund.
Are PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable industry within the Finance sector.