MetaCap

John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) vs Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund (UTF)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.6x vs 5.4x for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund). John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund offers the higher dividend yield (8.39% vs 7.46%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

PDT versus UTF key metrics
MetricPDTUTF
Share price$11.80$25.35
1-day change-0.34%-0.98%
P/E ratio (TTM)4.655.37
EPS (TTM)$2.54$4.72
Dividend yield8.39%7.46%
Annual dividend$0.99$1.89
52-week high$13.65$28.11
52-week low$11.56$23.42
Distance from 52-week high-13.55%-9.82%
Average volume128.91K301.70K
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance CompaniesFinance Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

PDT vs UTF FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, PDT or UTF?

PDT has the lower trailing P/E at 4.6, versus 5.4 for UTF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund or Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund?

John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund has the higher yield at 8.39%, compared with 7.46% for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund.

Are John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance Companies industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons