MetaCap

Performance Food Group (PFGC) vs Sysco (SYY)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.

Summary

Sysco (SYY) has outperformed Performance Food Group (PFGC) over the past year, gaining 0.1% versus a loss of 5.5%. Over five years, PFGC leads with a +100.3% price change compared with -5.0% for SYY. Sysco is the larger company by market cap ($38.44 billion vs $14.90 billion), about 2.6 times the size, while Performance Food Group is growing revenue faster (+7.2% vs +3.9%).

On valuation, Performance Food Group trades at a lower forward P/E (14.1x vs 14.6x for Sysco). Sysco pays a dividend yielding 2.78%, while Performance Food Group does not currently pay one. Sysco converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 2.1% versus 0.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

PFGC-5.48%SYY+0.13%
+19%-1%-21%
Oct 9, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
PFGC+98.33%SYY-6.25%
+148%+58%-33%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

PFGC versus SYY key metrics
MetricPFGCSYY
Share price$94.88$78.14
Market cap$14.90B$38.44B
1-day change+0.17%-0.08%
YTD return+5.52%+6.04%
1-year return-5.48%+0.13%
5-year return+100.34%-4.96%
P/E ratio (TTM)41.4321.35
Forward P/E14.0514.56
EPS (TTM)$2.29$3.66
Dividend yield0.00%2.78%
Annual dividend$0.00$2.17
Revenue (latest FY)$67.84B$84.55B
Revenue growth (YoY)+7.17%+3.91%
Net income (latest FY)$359.30M$1.76B
Gross margin11.93%18.50%
Operating margin1.31%3.66%
Net margin0.53%2.08%
52-week high$117.48$91.85
52-week low$80.82$68.19
Distance from 52-week high-19.23%-14.93%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+32.36%+16.24%
Average volume1.59M3.66M
Shares outstanding157.07M491.91M
Employees43,56075,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryFood DistributorsFood Distributors

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Sysco is about 2.6 times larger than Performance Food Group by market value ($38.44B vs $14.90B).
  • Performance Food Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (41.4x vs 21.3x trailing P/E).
  • Sysco offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.78% vs 0.00%).

About Performance Food Group

PFGC stock →

Performance Food Group Company, through its subsidiaries, markets and distributes food and food-related products in North America. It operates through three segments: Foodservice, Convenience, and Specialty.

Consumer Discretionary · Food Distributors · 43,560 employees

About Sysco

SYY stock →

Sysco Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in the sale, marketing, and distribution of food and related products to restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments, and other foodservice customers. It operates through U.S.

Consumer Discretionary · Food Distributors · 75,000 employees

PFGC vs SYY FAQ

Which is bigger, Performance Food Group or Sysco?

Sysco (SYY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $38.44B compared with $14.90B for Performance Food Group (PFGC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, PFGC or SYY?

SYY returned +0.13% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.48% for PFGC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, PFGC or SYY?

SYY has the lower trailing P/E at 21.3, versus 41.4 for PFGC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Performance Food Group or Sysco?

Sysco pays a dividend yielding 2.78%, while Performance Food Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Performance Food Group and Sysco in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Food Distributors industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons