Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs Reliance (RS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Reliance (RS) has outperformed Parker-Hannifin (PH) over the past year, gaining 41.3% versus a gain of 26.9%. Over five years, PH leads with a +219.8% price change compared with +168.5% for RS. Parker-Hannifin is the larger company by market cap ($120.16 billion vs $20.23 billion), about 5.9 times the size.
On valuation, Reliance trades at a lower forward P/E (16.8x vs 24.2x for Parker-Hannifin). Reliance offers the higher dividend yield (1.24% vs 0.78%). Parker-Hannifin converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 17.0% versus 5.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PH | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $952.79 | $396.22 |
| Market cap | $120.16B | $20.23B |
| 1-day change | -3.26% | -1.31% |
| YTD return | +8.40% | +37.16% |
| 1-year return | +26.92% | +41.29% |
| 5-year return | +219.78% | +168.48% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 34.58 | 23.02 |
| Forward P/E | 24.16 | 16.78 |
| EPS (TTM) | $27.55 | $17.21 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 1.24% |
| Annual dividend | $7.40 | $4.90 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $21.50B | $14.29B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.31% | +3.32% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $3.65B | $739.40M |
| Gross margin | 37.69% | 28.74% |
| Operating margin | 23.57% | 7.08% |
| Net margin | 16.97% | 5.17% |
| 52-week high | $1,099.94 | $433.02 |
| 52-week low | $715.37 | $260.31 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.38% | -8.50% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +21.25% | +3.29% |
| Average volume | 601.46K | 318.90K |
| Shares outstanding | 126.11M | 51.05M |
| Employees | 59,850 | 15,700 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Metal Fabrications |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Parker-Hannifin is about 5.9 times larger than Reliance by market value ($120.16B vs $20.23B).
- RS has outperformed PH by 14.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Parker-Hannifin trades at a higher earnings multiple (34.6x vs 23.0x trailing P/E).
- Parker-Hannifin is more profitable, keeping 17.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.2 cents for Reliance.
About Parker-Hannifin
PH stock →Parker-Hannifin Corporation engages in the manufacture and sale of motion and control technologies and systems for aerospace and defense, in-plant and industrial equipment, transportation, off-highway, energy, and HVAC and refrigeration markets in North America, EMEA, Asia Pacific, and Latin America. It operates through two segments: Diversified Industrial and Aerospace Systems.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 59,850 employees
About Reliance
RS stock →Reliance, Inc. operates as a diversified metal solutions provider and metals service center company primarily in the United States and Canada.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 15,700 employees
PH vs RS FAQ
Which is bigger, Parker-Hannifin or Reliance?
Parker-Hannifin (PH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $120.16B compared with $20.23B for Reliance (RS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PH or RS?
RS returned +41.29% over the past 12 months, compared with +26.92% for PH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PH or RS?
RS has the lower trailing P/E at 23.0, versus 34.6 for PH. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Parker-Hannifin or Reliance?
Reliance has the higher yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.78% for Parker-Hannifin.
Are Parker-Hannifin and Reliance in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Fabrications industry within the Industrials sector.