Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) vs Planet Fitness (PLNT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) has outperformed Planet Fitness (PLNT) over the past year, gaining 40.6% versus a loss of 55.5%. Over five years, PK leads with a -20.5% price change compared with -46.8% for PLNT. Planet Fitness is the larger company by market cap ($3.33 billion vs $3.07 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Planet Fitness trades at a lower forward P/E (12.0x vs 27.9x for Park Hotels & Resorts). Park Hotels & Resorts pays a dividend yielding 6.56%, while Planet Fitness does not currently pay one. Planet Fitness converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.5% versus -11.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PK | PLNT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.25 | $43.90 |
| Market cap | $3.07B | $3.33B |
| 1-day change | +0.30% | +1.88% |
| YTD return | +45.32% | -60.27% |
| 1-year return | +40.61% | -55.49% |
| 5-year return | -20.50% | -46.82% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 14.93 |
| Forward P/E | 27.92 | 11.99 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.82 | $2.94 |
| Dividend yield | 6.56% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.54B | $1.32B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.23% | +12.06% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-283.00M | $219.10M |
| Gross margin | — | 82.61% |
| Operating margin | -1.30% | 29.81% |
| Net margin | -11.14% | 16.55% |
| 52-week high | $16.20 | $114.26 |
| 52-week low | $9.84 | $37.03 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.90% | -61.58% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +5.35% | +48.77% |
| Average volume | 3.79M | 2.21M |
| Shares outstanding | 201.34M | 75.22M |
| Employees | 90 | 4,393 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Hotels/Resorts | Hotels/Resorts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PK has outperformed PLNT by 96.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Park Hotels & Resorts offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.56% vs 0.00%).
- Planet Fitness is more profitable, keeping 16.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -11.1 cents for Park Hotels & Resorts.
- Planet Fitness grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.06% vs -2.23%).
About Park Hotels & Resorts
PK stock →Park Hotels & Resorts inc. is one of the largest publicly traded lodging real estate investment trusts.
Consumer Discretionary · Hotels/Resorts · 90 employees
About Planet Fitness
PLNT stock →Planet Fitness, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, franchises and operates fitness centers under the Planet Fitness brand. The company operates through three segments: Franchise, Corporate-Owned Clubs, and Equipment.
Consumer Discretionary · Hotels/Resorts · 4,393 employees
PK vs PLNT FAQ
Which is bigger, Park Hotels & Resorts or Planet Fitness?
Planet Fitness (PLNT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.33B compared with $3.07B for Park Hotels & Resorts (PK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PK or PLNT?
PK returned +40.61% over the past 12 months, compared with -55.49% for PLNT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Park Hotels & Resorts or Planet Fitness?
Park Hotels & Resorts pays a dividend yielding 6.56%, while Planet Fitness does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Park Hotels & Resorts and Planet Fitness in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Hotels/Resorts industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.