MetaCap

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) vs RingCentral (RNG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

RingCentral (RNG) has outperformed D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) over the past year, gaining 189.2% versus a loss of 57.4%. Over five years, QBTS leads with a +48.8% price change compared with -66.7% for RNG. RingCentral is the larger company by market cap ($6.62 billion vs $5.53 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while D-Wave Quantum is growing revenue faster (+178.5% vs +4.8%).

RingCentral pays a dividend yielding 0.19%, while D-Wave Quantum does not currently pay one. RingCentral converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 1.7% versus -1444.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

QBTS-57.37%RNG+189.22%
+207%+66%-75%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
QBTS+48.98%RNG-65.32%
+310%+98%-115%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

QBTS versus RNG key metrics
MetricQBTSRNG
Share price$14.57$79.27
Market cap$5.53B$6.62B
1-day change-0.21%+1.17%
YTD return-44.17%+171.30%
1-year return-57.37%+189.22%
5-year return+48.83%-66.71%
P/E ratio (TTM)—63.42
Forward P/E—14.21
EPS (TTM)$-0.69$1.25
Dividend yield0.00%0.19%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.15
Revenue (latest FY)$24.59M$2.52B
Revenue growth (YoY)+178.54%+4.78%
Net income (latest FY)$-355.06M$43.39M
Gross margin82.59%71.24%
Operating margin-408.22%4.79%
Net margin-1444.10%1.73%
52-week high$46.75$81.90
52-week low$12.75$24.14
Distance from 52-week high-68.83%-3.21%
Analyst consensusstrong_buynone
Avg. price target upside+137.82%-27.29%
Average volume16.69M1.84M
Shares outstanding376.45M73.74M
Employees3827,378
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryEDP ServicesEDP Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • RNG has outperformed QBTS by 246.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • RingCentral is more profitable, keeping 1.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1444.1 cents for D-Wave Quantum.
  • D-Wave Quantum grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+178.54% vs +4.78%).

About D-Wave Quantum

QBTS stock →

D-Wave Quantum Inc. engages in the development and delivery of quantum computing systems, software, and services worldwide.

Technology · EDP Services · 382 employees

About RingCentral

RNG stock →

RingCentral, Inc., an agentic voice AI–powered cloud business communication services provider, delivering an integrated platform for business phone, SMS, contact center, workforce engagement management, video collaboration, and messaging. The company's products include RingEX, a AI-powered unified communications as a service platform for collaboration across voice, messaging, and video; RingCentral Contact Center, a contact center solution that delivers AI-powered omni-channel and workforce engagement solutions; RingCentral Customer Engagement Bundle, a comprehensive solution that includes phone, messaging, and SMS for businesses; and RingCX, a contact center as a service solution for AI-powered customer engagement with CRM integrations.

Technology · EDP Services · 7,378 employees

QBTS vs RNG FAQ

Which is bigger, D-Wave Quantum or RingCentral?

RingCentral (RNG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.62B compared with $5.53B for D-Wave Quantum (QBTS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, QBTS or RNG?

RNG returned +189.22% over the past 12 months, compared with -57.37% for QBTS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, D-Wave Quantum or RingCentral?

RingCentral pays a dividend yielding 0.19%, while D-Wave Quantum does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are D-Wave Quantum and RingCentral in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the EDP Services industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons