RBC Bearings (RBC) vs Timken (TKR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Timken (TKR) has outperformed RBC Bearings (RBC) over the past year, gaining 50.7% versus a gain of 28.5%. Over five years, RBC leads with a +121.5% price change compared with +58.7% for TKR. RBC Bearings is the larger company by market cap ($15.54 billion vs $7.92 billion), about 2.0 times the size.
On valuation, Timken trades at a lower forward P/E (15.7x vs 29.5x for RBC Bearings). Timken pays a dividend yielding 1.23%, while RBC Bearings does not currently pay one. RBC Bearings converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.4% versus 6.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | RBC | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $490.99 | $114.34 |
| Market cap | $15.54B | $7.92B |
| 1-day change | -1.95% | -0.50% |
| YTD return | +9.49% | +35.91% |
| 1-year return | +28.47% | +50.73% |
| 5-year return | +121.52% | +58.67% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 48.52 | 30.99 |
| Forward P/E | 29.50 | 15.74 |
| EPS (TTM) | $10.12 | $3.69 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.23% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.41 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.87B | $4.58B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +14.34% | +0.19% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $287.60M | $288.40M |
| Gross margin | 44.37% | 30.41% |
| Operating margin | 22.50% | 11.80% |
| Net margin | 15.37% | 6.29% |
| 52-week high | $667.69 | $146.37 |
| 52-week low | $364.50 | $70.57 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -26.46% | -21.88% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +27.52% | +28.10% |
| Average volume | 267.85K | 919.13K |
| Shares outstanding | 31.66M | 69.30M |
| Employees | 5,816 | 19,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Metal Fabrications |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- TKR has outperformed RBC by 22.3 percentage points over the past year.
- RBC Bearings trades at a higher earnings multiple (48.5x vs 31.0x trailing P/E).
- Timken offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.23% vs 0.00%).
- RBC Bearings is more profitable, keeping 15.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.3 cents for Timken.
- RBC Bearings grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+14.34% vs +0.19%).
About RBC Bearings
RBC stock →RBC Bearings Incorporated manufactures and markets engineered precision bearings, components, and systems in the United States and internationally. It operates through two segments: Aerospace/Defense and Industrial.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 5,816 employees
About Timken
TKR stock →The Timken Company designs, manufactures, and sells engineered bearings and industrial motion products, and related services in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Engineered Bearings and Industrial Motion.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 19,000 employees
RBC vs TKR FAQ
Which is bigger, RBC Bearings or Timken?
RBC Bearings (RBC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $15.54B compared with $7.92B for Timken (TKR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, RBC or TKR?
TKR returned +50.73% over the past 12 months, compared with +28.47% for RBC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, RBC or TKR?
TKR has the lower trailing P/E at 31.0, versus 48.5 for RBC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, RBC Bearings or Timken?
Timken pays a dividend yielding 1.23%, while RBC Bearings does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are RBC Bearings and Timken in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Fabrications industry within the Industrials sector.