RingCentral (RNG) vs ServiceTitan (TTAN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
RingCentral (RNG) has outperformed ServiceTitan (TTAN) over the past year, gaining 182.9% versus a loss of 27.3%. ServiceTitan is the larger company by market cap ($6.92 billion vs $6.39 billion), about 1.1 times the size. On valuation, RingCentral trades at a lower forward P/E (13.7x vs 43.4x for ServiceTitan).
RingCentral pays a dividend yielding 0.20%, while ServiceTitan does not currently pay one. RingCentral converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 1.7% versus -16.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | RNG | TTAN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $76.54 | $71.74 |
| Market cap | $6.39B | $6.92B |
| 1-day change | -0.93% | +4.47% |
| YTD return | +165.84% | -32.13% |
| 1-year return | +182.89% | -27.28% |
| 5-year return | -67.38% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 61.23 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.72 | 43.36 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.25 | $-1.36 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.15 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.52B | $960.97M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.78% | +24.50% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $43.39M | $-159.85M |
| Gross margin | 71.24% | 70.11% |
| Operating margin | 4.79% | -17.61% |
| Net margin | 1.73% | -16.63% |
| 52-week high | $81.90 | $111.36 |
| 52-week low | $24.14 | $53.00 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -6.54% | -35.58% |
| Analyst consensus | none | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -24.69% | +35.95% |
| Average volume | 1.84M | 2.28M |
| Shares outstanding | 73.74M | 84.08M |
| Employees | 7,378 | 3,414 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- RNG has outperformed TTAN by 210.2 percentage points over the past year.
- RingCentral is more profitable, keeping 1.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -16.6 cents for ServiceTitan.
- ServiceTitan grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+24.50% vs +4.78%).
About RingCentral
RNG stock →RingCentral, Inc., an agentic voice AIpowered cloud business communication services provider, delivering an integrated platform for business phone, SMS, contact center, workforce engagement management, video collaboration, and messaging. The company's products include RingEX, a AI-powered unified communications as a service platform for collaboration across voice, messaging, and video; RingCentral Contact Center, a contact center solution that delivers AI-powered omni-channel and workforce engagement solutions; RingCentral Customer Engagement Bundle, a comprehensive solution that includes phone, messaging, and SMS for businesses; and RingCX, a contact center as a service solution for AI-powered customer engagement with CRM integrations.
Technology · Software - Application · 7,378 employees
About ServiceTitan
TTAN stock →ServiceTitan, Inc. provides an end-to-end cloud-based software platform in the United States, Armenia, and Canada.
Technology · Software - Application · 3,414 employees
RNG vs TTAN FAQ
Which is bigger, RingCentral or ServiceTitan?
ServiceTitan (TTAN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.92B compared with $6.39B for RingCentral (RNG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, RNG or TTAN?
RNG returned +182.89% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.28% for TTAN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, RingCentral or ServiceTitan?
RingCentral pays a dividend yielding 0.20%, while ServiceTitan does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are RingCentral and ServiceTitan in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector.