MetaCap

ReNew Energy Global (RNW) vs XPLR Infrastructure (XIFR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.

Summary

XPLR Infrastructure (XIFR) has outperformed ReNew Energy Global (RNW) over the past year, losing 3.4% versus a loss of 14.9%. Over five years, RNW leads with a -18.7% price change compared with -86.8% for XIFR. ReNew Energy Global is the larger company by market cap ($2.51 billion vs $977.9 million), about 2.6 times the size.

On valuation, XPLR Infrastructure trades at a lower trailing P/E (15.0x vs 20.8x for ReNew Energy Global). ReNew Energy Global converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.0% versus -2.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

RNW-14.81%XIFR-3.63%
+23%-12%-48%
Oct 9, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
RNW-25.49%XIFR-86.37%
+20%-37%-94%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

RNW versus XIFR key metrics
MetricRNWXIFR
Share price$6.88$10.37
Market cap$2.51B$977.89M
1-day change-0.29%+0.29%
YTD return+22.12%+3.70%
1-year return-14.92%-3.36%
5-year return-18.73%-86.77%
P/E ratio (TTM)20.8515.03
Forward P/E9.95—
EPS (TTM)$0.33$0.69
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$1.14B$1.19B
Revenue growth (YoY)+16.39%-3.41%
Net income (latest FY)$45.00M$-28.00M
Operating margin10.39%-15.66%
Net margin3.96%-2.36%
52-week high$8.15$13.25
52-week low$4.39$8.68
Distance from 52-week high-15.58%-21.74%
Analyst consensusbuyhold
Avg. price target upside+10.32%+17.45%
Average volume2.14M904.12K
Shares outstanding246.20M94.27M
Employees4,720—
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryUtilities - RenewableElectric Utilities: Central

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ReNew Energy Global is about 2.6 times larger than XPLR Infrastructure by market value ($2.51B vs $977.89M).
  • XIFR has outperformed RNW by 11.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • ReNew Energy Global trades at a higher earnings multiple (20.8x vs 15.0x trailing P/E).
  • ReNew Energy Global is more profitable, keeping 4.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -2.4 cents for XPLR Infrastructure.
  • ReNew Energy Global grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+16.39% vs -3.41%).

About ReNew Energy Global

RNW stock →

ReNew Energy Global Plc, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the generation of power through non-conventional and renewable energy sources in India. It operates through two segments, Generation and Sale of Renewable Power, and Manufacturing of Power Equipment's.

Utilities · Utilities - Renewable · 4,720 employees

About XPLR Infrastructure

XIFR stock →

XPLR Infrastructure, LP engages in the energy selling business in the United States. It operates a portfolio of contracted clean energy assets, including wind, solar, and battery storage projects.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central

RNW vs XIFR FAQ

Which is bigger, ReNew Energy Global or XPLR Infrastructure?

ReNew Energy Global (RNW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.51B compared with $977.89M for XPLR Infrastructure (XIFR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, RNW or XIFR?

XIFR returned -3.36% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.92% for RNW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, RNW or XIFR?

XIFR has the lower trailing P/E at 15.0, versus 20.8 for RNW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are ReNew Energy Global and XPLR Infrastructure in the same industry?

Both are in the Utilities sector, but in different industries: Utilities - Renewable for ReNew Energy Global and Electric Utilities: Central for XPLR Infrastructure.

More comparisons