Texas Pacific Land (TPL) vs Woodside Energy Group (WDS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Woodside Energy Group (WDS) has outperformed Texas Pacific Land (TPL) over the past year, gaining 49.7% versus a gain of 12.6%. Over five years, TPL leads with a +163.4% price change compared with +21.1% for WDS. On valuation, Texas Pacific Land trades at a lower forward P/E (4.9x vs 11.9x for Woodside Energy Group).
Woodside Energy Group offers the higher dividend yield (5.14% vs 0.63%). Texas Pacific Land converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 60.3% versus 20.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | TPL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $357.78 | $22.59 |
| Market cap | $24.68B | — |
| 1-day change | +3.47% | +3.77% |
| YTD return | +24.57% | +44.90% |
| 1-year return | +12.64% | +49.70% |
| 5-year return | +163.43% | +21.06% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 45.64 | 14.12 |
| Forward P/E | 4.89 | 11.90 |
| EPS (TTM) | $7.84 | $1.60 |
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | 5.14% |
| Annual dividend | $2.27 | $1.16 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $798.19M | $12.98B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +13.09% | -1.48% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $481.38M | $2.72B |
| Gross margin | — | 34.94% |
| Operating margin | 74.19% | 29.95% |
| Net margin | 60.31% | 20.93% |
| 52-week high | $547.20 | $25.19 |
| 52-week low | $269.23 | $14.27 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -34.62% | -10.32% |
| Analyst consensus | none | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +23.82% | +8.59% |
| Average volume | 358.91K | 622.41K |
| Shares outstanding | 68.97M | — |
| Employees | 114 | 4,693 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WDS has outperformed TPL by 37.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Texas Pacific Land trades at a higher earnings multiple (45.6x vs 14.1x trailing P/E).
- Woodside Energy Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.14% vs 0.63%).
- Texas Pacific Land is more profitable, keeping 60.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 20.9 cents for Woodside Energy Group.
- Texas Pacific Land grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+13.09% vs -1.48%).
About Texas Pacific Land
TPL stock →Texas Pacific Land Corporation engages in the land and resource management, and water services and operations businesses. The Land and Resource Management segment manages surface acres of land, and oil and gas royalty interest in Permian Basin.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 114 employees
About Woodside Energy Group
WDS stock →Woodside Energy Group Ltd engages in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing, and sale of hydrocarbons in the Asia Pacific, Africa, the Americas, and the Europe. It produces liquefied natural gas, pipeline gas, crude oil and condensate, and natural gas liquids.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 4,693 employees
TPL vs WDS FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, TPL or WDS?
WDS returned +49.70% over the past 12 months, compared with +12.64% for TPL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, TPL or WDS?
WDS has the lower trailing P/E at 14.1, versus 45.6 for TPL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Texas Pacific Land or Woodside Energy Group?
Woodside Energy Group has the higher yield at 5.14%, compared with 0.63% for Texas Pacific Land.
Are Texas Pacific Land and Woodside Energy Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.