VeriSign (VRSN) vs Wipro (WIT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
VeriSign (VRSN) has outperformed Wipro (WIT) over the past year, gaining 8.9% versus a loss of 36.5%. Over five years, VRSN leads with a +37.2% price change compared with -66.3% for WIT. VeriSign is the larger company by market cap ($26.60 billion vs $16.52 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, Wipro trades at a lower forward P/E (11.1x vs 26.6x for VeriSign). Wipro offers the higher dividend yield (479.04% vs 1.07%). VeriSign converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 49.8% versus 14.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | VRSN | WIT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $294.22 | $1.67 |
| Market cap | $26.60B | $16.52B |
| 1-day change | +0.38% | -0.60% |
| YTD return | +21.10% | -41.20% |
| 1-year return | +8.85% | -36.50% |
| 5-year return | +37.18% | -66.30% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 31.95 | 11.93 |
| Forward P/E | 26.60 | 11.14 |
| EPS (TTM) | $9.21 | $0.14 |
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | 479.04% |
| Annual dividend | $3.16 | $8.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.66B | $10.43B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +6.37% | -3.18% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $825.70M | $1.54B |
| Gross margin | 88.15% | 30.66% |
| Operating margin | 67.67% | 16.98% |
| Net margin | 49.84% | 14.74% |
| 52-week high | $312.48 | $3.09 |
| 52-week low | $208.86 | $1.59 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.84% | -45.95% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | underperform |
| Avg. price target upside | +10.26% | 0.00% |
| Average volume | 771.35K | 8.57M |
| Shares outstanding | 90.40M | 9.89B |
| Employees | 926 | 240,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | EDP Services | EDP Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- VRSN has outperformed WIT by 45.4 percentage points over the past year.
- VeriSign trades at a higher earnings multiple (31.9x vs 11.9x trailing P/E).
- Wipro offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (479.04% vs 1.07%).
- VeriSign is more profitable, keeping 49.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 14.7 cents for Wipro.
- VeriSign grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+6.37% vs -3.18%).
About VeriSign
VRSN stock →VeriSign, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides internet infrastructure and domain name registry services that enables internet navigation for various recognized domain names worldwide. The company provides root zone maintainer services, operating two of thirteen internet root servers; and offering registration services and authoritative resolution for the .com and .net domains, which supports global e-commerce.
Technology · EDP Services · 926 employees
About Wipro
WIT stock →Wipro Limited operates as an information technology (IT), consulting, and business process services company worldwide. It operates through IT Services and IT Products segments.
Technology · EDP Services · 240,000 employees
VRSN vs WIT FAQ
Which is bigger, VeriSign or Wipro?
VeriSign (VRSN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $26.60B compared with $16.52B for Wipro (WIT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, VRSN or WIT?
VRSN returned +8.85% over the past 12 months, compared with -36.50% for WIT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, VRSN or WIT?
WIT has the lower trailing P/E at 11.9, versus 31.9 for VRSN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, VeriSign or Wipro?
Wipro has the higher yield at 479.04%, compared with 1.07% for VeriSign.
Are VeriSign and Wipro in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the EDP Services industry within the Technology sector.