MetaCap

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) vs Zeta Global (ZETA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Zeta Global (ZETA) has outperformed Full Truck Alliance (YMM) over the past year, gaining 67.1% versus a loss of 36.3%. Over five years, ZETA leads with a +316.0% price change compared with -41.1% for YMM. Full Truck Alliance is the larger company by market cap ($8.93 billion vs $8.33 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Zeta Global is growing revenue faster (+29.7% vs +16.0%).

On valuation, Full Truck Alliance trades at a lower forward P/E (9.8x vs 27.6x for Zeta Global). Full Truck Alliance pays a dividend yielding 21.24%, while Zeta Global does not currently pay one. Full Truck Alliance converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 35.7% versus -2.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

YMM-36.27%ZETA+67.07%
+76%+14%-48%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
YMM-49.36%ZETA+284.97%
+334%+122%-90%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

YMM versus ZETA key metrics
MetricYMMZETA
Share price$8.54$33.41
Market cap$8.93B$8.33B
1-day change+2.46%+1.15%
YTD return-22.37%+62.31%
1-year return-36.27%+67.07%
5-year return-41.09%+315.99%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.97—
Forward P/E9.8127.64
EPS (TTM)$0.57$-0.01
Dividend yield21.24%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.81$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$1.79B$1.30B
Revenue growth (YoY)+16.00%+29.72%
Net income (latest FY)$637.64M$-31.51M
Gross margin63.02%60.63%
Operating margin33.20%0.41%
Net margin35.70%-2.42%
52-week high$13.40$34.80
52-week low$7.46$14.37
Distance from 52-week high-36.31%-3.99%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+46.46%-2.93%
Average volume6.70M7.57M
Shares outstanding932.51M225.62M
Employees8,2513,300
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryComputer Software: Prepackaged SoftwareComputer Software: Prepackaged Software

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ZETA has outperformed YMM by 103.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Full Truck Alliance offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (21.24% vs 0.00%).
  • Full Truck Alliance is more profitable, keeping 35.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -2.4 cents for Zeta Global.
  • Zeta Global grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+29.72% vs +16.00%).

About Full Truck Alliance

YMM stock →

Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, operates a digital freight platform that connects shippers with truckers to facilitate shipments across distance ranges, cargo weights, and types in the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong.

Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 8,251 employees

About Zeta Global

ZETA stock →

Zeta Global Holdings Corp. operates an omnichannel data-driven cloud platform that provides enterprises with consumer intelligence and marketing automation software in the United States and internationally.

Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 3,300 employees

YMM vs ZETA FAQ

Which is bigger, Full Truck Alliance or Zeta Global?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.93B compared with $8.33B for Zeta Global (ZETA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, YMM or ZETA?

ZETA returned +67.07% over the past 12 months, compared with -36.27% for YMM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Full Truck Alliance or Zeta Global?

Full Truck Alliance pays a dividend yielding 21.24%, while Zeta Global does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Full Truck Alliance and Zeta Global in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons