Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) vs Cohen & Steers (CNS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) has outperformed Cohen & Steers (CNS) over the past year, gaining 108.2% versus a gain of 6.2%. Over five years, AAMI leads with a +245.9% price change compared with -19.3% for CNS. Cohen & Steers is the larger company by market cap ($3.63 billion vs $3.28 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Acadian Asset Management is growing revenue faster (+11.5% vs +7.5%).
On valuation, Acadian Asset Management trades at a lower forward P/E (14.3x vs 17.7x for Cohen & Steers). Cohen & Steers offers the higher dividend yield (3.66% vs 0.33%). Cohen & Steers converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 27.6% versus 14.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AAMI | CNS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $92.55 | $70.50 |
| Market cap | $3.28B | $3.63B |
| 1-day change | -1.01% | -2.84% |
| YTD return | +96.91% | +12.30% |
| 1-year return | +108.16% | +6.21% |
| 5-year return | +245.85% | -19.28% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 32.82 | 21.69 |
| Forward P/E | 14.28 | 17.71 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.82 | $3.25 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 3.66% |
| Annual dividend | $0.31 | $2.58 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $563.70M | $556.12M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.49% | +7.48% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $80.00M | $153.22M |
| Operating margin | 23.43% | 31.96% |
| Net margin | 14.19% | 27.55% |
| 52-week high | $98.52 | $86.56 |
| 52-week low | $41.47 | $58.39 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -6.06% | -18.55% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -1.67% | +8.27% |
| Average volume | 423.40K | 272.19K |
| Shares outstanding | 35.49M | 51.42M |
| Employees | 396 | 424 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AAMI has outperformed CNS by 102.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Acadian Asset Management trades at a higher earnings multiple (32.8x vs 21.7x trailing P/E).
- Cohen & Steers offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.66% vs 0.33%).
- Cohen & Steers is more profitable, keeping 27.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 14.2 cents for Acadian Asset Management.
About Acadian Asset Management
AAMI stock →Acadian Asset Management Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Finance · Investment Managers · 396 employees
About Cohen & Steers
CNS stock →Cohen & Steers, Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Finance · Investment Managers · 424 employees
AAMI vs CNS FAQ
Which is bigger, Acadian Asset Management or Cohen & Steers?
Cohen & Steers (CNS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.63B compared with $3.28B for Acadian Asset Management (AAMI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AAMI or CNS?
AAMI returned +108.16% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.21% for CNS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AAMI or CNS?
CNS has the lower trailing P/E at 21.7, versus 32.8 for AAMI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acadian Asset Management or Cohen & Steers?
Cohen & Steers has the higher yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.33% for Acadian Asset Management.
Are Acadian Asset Management and Cohen & Steers in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.