Cohen & Steers (CNS) vs Lazard (LAZ)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Cohen & Steers (CNS) has outperformed Lazard (LAZ) over the past year, gaining 6.2% versus a loss of 28.2%. Over five years, CNS leads with a -19.3% price change compared with -28.5% for LAZ. Cohen & Steers is the larger company by market cap ($3.64 billion vs $3.49 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Lazard trades at a lower forward P/E (9.8x vs 17.8x for Cohen & Steers). Lazard offers the higher dividend yield (5.58% vs 3.65%). Cohen & Steers converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 27.6% versus 7.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CNS | LAZ |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $70.71 | $35.82 |
| Market cap | $3.64B | $3.49B |
| 1-day change | +0.30% | 0.00% |
| YTD return | +12.30% | -26.24% |
| 1-year return | +6.21% | -28.20% |
| 5-year return | -19.28% | -28.55% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.76 | 17.56 |
| Forward P/E | 17.77 | 9.77 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.25 | $2.04 |
| Dividend yield | 3.65% | 5.58% |
| Annual dividend | $2.58 | $2.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $556.12M | $3.19B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.48% | +1.48% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $153.22M | $236.83M |
| Operating margin | 31.96% | 10.28% |
| Net margin | 27.55% | 7.43% |
| 52-week high | $86.56 | $58.75 |
| 52-week low | $58.39 | $34.76 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.31% | -39.03% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +7.95% | +26.33% |
| Average volume | 272.19K | 1.67M |
| Shares outstanding | 51.42M | 97.45M |
| Employees | 424 | 3,279 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CNS has outperformed LAZ by 34.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Lazard offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.58% vs 3.65%).
- Cohen & Steers is more profitable, keeping 27.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 7.4 cents for Lazard.
- Cohen & Steers grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.48% vs +1.48%).
About Cohen & Steers
CNS stock →Cohen & Steers, Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Finance · Investment Managers · 424 employees
About Lazard
LAZ stock →Lazard, Inc. operates as a financial advisory and asset management firm in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.
Finance · Investment Managers · 3,279 employees
CNS vs LAZ FAQ
Which is bigger, Cohen & Steers or Lazard?
Cohen & Steers (CNS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.64B compared with $3.49B for Lazard (LAZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CNS or LAZ?
CNS returned +6.21% over the past 12 months, compared with -28.20% for LAZ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CNS or LAZ?
LAZ has the lower trailing P/E at 17.6, versus 21.8 for CNS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Cohen & Steers or Lazard?
Lazard has the higher yield at 5.58%, compared with 3.65% for Cohen & Steers.
Are Cohen & Steers and Lazard in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.