AllianceBernstein L.P. Units (AB) vs Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) has outperformed AllianceBernstein L.P. Units (AB) over the past year, gaining 6.2% versus a loss of 8.7%. Over five years, CSQ leads with a +12.3% price change compared with -32.7% for AB. Calamos Strategic Total Return is the larger company by market cap ($3.29 billion vs $3.27 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Calamos Strategic Total Return trades at a lower trailing P/E (3.1x vs 10.4x for AllianceBernstein L.P. Units). AllianceBernstein L.P. Units offers the higher dividend yield (9.89% vs 3.00%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AB | CSQ |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $35.10 | $20.51 |
| Market cap | $3.27B | $3.29B |
| 1-day change | +0.03% | -0.44% |
| YTD return | -8.81% | +6.82% |
| 1-year return | -8.71% | +6.21% |
| 5-year return | -32.73% | +12.26% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.42 | 3.14 |
| Forward P/E | 9.36 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.37 | $6.53 |
| Dividend yield | 9.89% | 3.00% |
| Annual dividend | $3.47 | $0.615 |
| Net income (latest FY) | $299.84M | — |
| 52-week high | $44.11 | $21.17 |
| 52-week low | $34.58 | $16.41 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -20.43% | -3.12% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +9.09% | — |
| Average volume | 284.38K | 185.82K |
| Shares outstanding | 93.08M | 160.37M |
| Employees | 4,400 | — |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CSQ has outperformed AB by 14.9 percentage points over the past year.
- AllianceBernstein L.P. Units trades at a higher earnings multiple (10.4x vs 3.1x trailing P/E).
- AllianceBernstein L.P. Units offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.89% vs 3.00%).
About AllianceBernstein L.P. Units
AB stock →AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. is a publicly owned investment manager.
Financial Services · Asset Management · 4,400 employees
About Calamos Strategic Total Return
CSQ stock →Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is a closed ended balanced mutual fund launched by Calamos Investments LLC. The fund is managed by Calamos Advisors LLC.
Financial Services · Asset Management
AB vs CSQ FAQ
Which is bigger, AllianceBernstein L.P. Units or Calamos Strategic Total Return?
Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.29B compared with $3.27B for AllianceBernstein L.P. Units (AB).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AB or CSQ?
CSQ returned +6.21% over the past 12 months, compared with -8.71% for AB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AB or CSQ?
CSQ has the lower trailing P/E at 3.1, versus 10.4 for AB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, AllianceBernstein L.P. Units or Calamos Strategic Total Return?
AllianceBernstein L.P. Units has the higher yield at 9.89%, compared with 3.00% for Calamos Strategic Total Return.
Are AllianceBernstein L.P. Units and Calamos Strategic Total Return in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector.