Arcosa (ACA) vs Fluor (FLR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Arcosa (ACA) has outperformed Fluor (FLR) over the past year, gaining 61.1% versus a gain of 19.2%. Over five years, FLR leads with a +192.5% price change compared with +181.4% for ACA. Arcosa is the larger company by market cap ($7.19 billion vs $6.84 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Fluor trades at a lower forward P/E (15.2x vs 28.6x for Arcosa). Arcosa pays a dividend yielding 0.14%, while Fluor does not currently pay one. Arcosa converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.2% versus -0.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ACA | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $146.40 | $51.14 |
| Market cap | $7.19B | $6.84B |
| 1-day change | -0.07% | -1.65% |
| YTD return | +37.70% | +29.04% |
| 1-year return | +61.13% | +19.15% |
| 5-year return | +181.43% | +192.48% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 36.15 | — |
| Forward P/E | 28.60 | 15.19 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.05 | $-11.90 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.20 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.88B | $15.50B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.20% | -4.98% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $208.40M | $-51.00M |
| Gross margin | 22.45% | -0.77% |
| Operating margin | 11.86% | -2.44% |
| Net margin | 7.23% | -0.33% |
| 52-week high | $147.05 | $58.35 |
| 52-week low | $89.03 | $39.33 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.44% | -12.36% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +0.18% | +20.63% |
| Average volume | 675.84K | 2.41M |
| Shares outstanding | 49.11M | 133.74M |
| Employees | 6,390 | 22,995 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ACA has outperformed FLR by 42.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Arcosa is more profitable, keeping 7.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.3 cents for Fluor.
- Arcosa grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.20% vs -4.98%).
About Arcosa
ACA stock →Arcosa, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides infrastructure-related products and solutions for the construction, engineered structures, and transportation markets in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Construction Products, Engineered Structures, and Transportation Products.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 6,390 employees
About Fluor
FLR stock →Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC); fabrication and modularization; and project management services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,995 employees
ACA vs FLR FAQ
Which is bigger, Arcosa or Fluor?
Arcosa (ACA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.19B compared with $6.84B for Fluor (FLR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ACA or FLR?
ACA returned +61.13% over the past 12 months, compared with +19.15% for FLR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Arcosa or Fluor?
Arcosa pays a dividend yielding 0.14%, while Fluor does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Arcosa and Fluor in the same industry?
Both are in the Industrials sector, but in different industries: Metal Fabrications for Arcosa and Military/Government/Technical for Fluor.