Acco Brands (ACCO) vs Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Acco Brands (ACCO) has outperformed Thomson Reuters (TRI) over the past year, gaining 11.8% versus a loss of 33.1%. Over five years, TRI leads with a -16.0% price change compared with -49.5% for ACCO. Thomson Reuters is the larger company by market cap ($44.32 billion vs $410.8 million), about 107.9 times the size.
On valuation, Acco Brands trades at a lower forward P/E (4.6x vs 20.1x for Thomson Reuters). Acco Brands offers the higher dividend yield (6.74% vs 2.48%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ACCO | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $4.45 | $102.29 |
| Market cap | $410.77M | $44.32B |
| 1-day change | -0.22% | +0.73% |
| YTD return | +19.57% | -23.00% |
| 1-year return | +11.78% | -33.06% |
| 5-year return | -49.49% | -16.03% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.18 | 26.85 |
| Forward P/E | 4.62 | 20.12 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.62 | $3.81 |
| Dividend yield | 6.74% | 2.48% |
| Annual dividend | $0.30 | $2.54 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $7.48B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +3.00% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $1.50B |
| Operating margin | — | 28.52% |
| Net margin | — | 20.09% |
| 52-week high | $4.56 | $164.30 |
| 52-week low | $2.81 | $76.28 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -2.41% | -37.74% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +79.78% | +19.55% |
| Average volume | 663.24K | 1.87M |
| Shares outstanding | 92.31M | 433.25M |
| Employees | 4,700 | 27,100 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Publishing | Publishing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Thomson Reuters is about 107.9 times larger than Acco Brands by market value ($44.32B vs $410.77M).
- ACCO has outperformed TRI by 44.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Thomson Reuters trades at a higher earnings multiple (26.8x vs 7.2x trailing P/E).
- Acco Brands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.74% vs 2.48%).
About Acco Brands
ACCO stock →ACCO Brands Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets consumer, school, technology, and office products in the United States, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Europe, the Middle East, Australia, New Zealand, and Asia. It operates in two segments, ACCO Brands Americas and ACCO Brands International.
Consumer Discretionary · Publishing · 4,700 employees
About Thomson Reuters
TRI stock →Thomson Reuters Corporation operates as a content and technology company in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through five segments: Legal Professionals, Corporates, Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals, Reuters News, and Global Print.
Consumer Discretionary · Publishing · 27,100 employees
ACCO vs TRI FAQ
Which is bigger, Acco Brands or Thomson Reuters?
Thomson Reuters (TRI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $44.32B compared with $410.77M for Acco Brands (ACCO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ACCO or TRI?
ACCO returned +11.78% over the past 12 months, compared with -33.06% for TRI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ACCO or TRI?
ACCO has the lower trailing P/E at 7.2, versus 26.8 for TRI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acco Brands or Thomson Reuters?
Acco Brands has the higher yield at 6.74%, compared with 2.48% for Thomson Reuters.
Are Acco Brands and Thomson Reuters in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Publishing industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.