McGraw Hill (MH) vs Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
McGraw Hill (MH) has outperformed Thomson Reuters (TRI) over the past year, gaining 7.0% versus a loss of 33.1%. Thomson Reuters is the larger company by market cap ($44.00 billion vs $2.56 billion), about 17.2 times the size. On valuation, McGraw Hill trades at a lower forward P/E (6.4x vs 20.0x for Thomson Reuters).
Thomson Reuters pays a dividend yielding 2.50%, while McGraw Hill does not currently pay one. Thomson Reuters converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 20.1% versus 1.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MH | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $13.37 | $101.55 |
| Market cap | $2.56B | $44.00B |
| 1-day change | +2.06% | +2.29% |
| YTD return | -18.97% | -23.00% |
| 1-year return | +6.96% | -33.06% |
| 5-year return | — | -16.03% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 27.85 | 26.65 |
| Forward P/E | 6.44 | 19.98 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.48 | $3.81 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.50% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $2.54 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.10B | $7.48B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.07% | +3.00% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $35.32M | $1.50B |
| Gross margin | 80.92% | — |
| Operating margin | 13.16% | 28.52% |
| Net margin | 1.68% | 20.09% |
| 52-week high | $18.00 | $164.30 |
| 52-week low | $8.95 | $76.28 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -25.72% | -38.19% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +34.03% | +20.42% |
| Average volume | 617.77K | 1.87M |
| Shares outstanding | 191.31M | 433.25M |
| Employees | 4,400 | 27,100 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Publishing | Publishing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Thomson Reuters is about 17.2 times larger than McGraw Hill by market value ($44.00B vs $2.56B).
- MH has outperformed TRI by 40.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Thomson Reuters offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.50% vs 0.00%).
- Thomson Reuters is more profitable, keeping 20.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.7 cents for McGraw Hill.
About McGraw Hill
MH stock →McGraw Hill, Inc., doing business as McGraw Hill, provides education solutions for K-12, higher education, and professional learning in the United States and internationally. It operates through K-12, Higher Education, Global Professional, and International segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Publishing · 4,400 employees
About Thomson Reuters
TRI stock →Thomson Reuters Corporation operates as a content and technology company in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through five segments: Legal Professionals, Corporates, Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals, Reuters News, and Global Print.
Consumer Discretionary · Publishing · 27,100 employees
MH vs TRI FAQ
Which is bigger, McGraw Hill or Thomson Reuters?
Thomson Reuters (TRI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $44.00B compared with $2.56B for McGraw Hill (MH).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MH or TRI?
MH returned +6.96% over the past 12 months, compared with -33.06% for TRI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MH or TRI?
TRI has the lower trailing P/E at 26.7, versus 27.9 for MH. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, McGraw Hill or Thomson Reuters?
Thomson Reuters pays a dividend yielding 2.50%, while McGraw Hill does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are McGraw Hill and Thomson Reuters in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Publishing industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.