AECOM (ACM) vs Ferrovial N.V. (FER)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Ferrovial N.V. (FER) has outperformed AECOM (ACM) over the past year, losing 16.2% versus a loss of 55.0%. Over five years, FER leads with a +72.1% price change compared with -8.2% for ACM. Ferrovial N.V. is the larger company by market cap ($36.42 billion vs $7.50 billion), about 4.9 times the size.
On valuation, AECOM trades at a lower forward P/E (9.1x vs 38.0x for Ferrovial N.V.). AECOM offers the higher dividend yield (2.04% vs 1.10%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ACM | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $58.28 | $50.60 |
| Market cap | $7.50B | $36.42B |
| 1-day change | -3.13% | -1.67% |
| YTD return | -38.86% | -21.68% |
| 1-year return | -54.97% | -16.17% |
| 5-year return | -8.22% | +72.11% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 20.52 | 27.80 |
| Forward P/E | 9.14 | 37.97 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.84 | $1.82 |
| Dividend yield | 2.04% | 1.10% |
| Annual dividend | $1.19 | $0.558 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $16.14B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.21% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $561.77M | — |
| Gross margin | 7.54% | — |
| Operating margin | 6.36% | — |
| Net margin | 3.48% | — |
| 52-week high | $135.52 | $74.79 |
| 52-week low | $56.39 | $50.36 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -57.00% | -32.34% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +47.70% | +43.75% |
| Average volume | 1.93M | 1.53M |
| Shares outstanding | 128.70M | 719.79M |
| Employees | 51,000 | 22,359 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Ferrovial N.V. is about 4.9 times larger than AECOM by market value ($36.42B vs $7.50B).
- FER has outperformed ACM by 38.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Ferrovial N.V. trades at a higher earnings multiple (27.8x vs 20.5x trailing P/E).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: AECOM in Consumer Discretionary and Ferrovial N.V. in Industrials.
About AECOM
ACM stock →AECOM, together with its subsidiaries, provides professional infrastructure consulting services for governments, businesses, and organizations internationally. The company operates in three segments: Americas, International, and AECOM Capital.
Consumer Discretionary · Military/Government/Technical · 51,000 employees
About Ferrovial N.V.
FER stock →Ferrovial N.V., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. It operates through four segments: Construction, Highways, Airports, and Energy.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,359 employees
ACM vs FER FAQ
Which is bigger, AECOM or Ferrovial N.V.?
Ferrovial N.V. (FER) is larger, with a market capitalization of $36.42B compared with $7.50B for AECOM (ACM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ACM or FER?
FER returned -16.17% over the past 12 months, compared with -54.97% for ACM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ACM or FER?
ACM has the lower trailing P/E at 20.5, versus 27.8 for FER. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, AECOM or Ferrovial N.V.?
AECOM has the higher yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.10% for Ferrovial N.V..
Are AECOM and Ferrovial N.V. in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.