Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) vs J.M. Smucker (SJM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) has outperformed J.M. Smucker (SJM) over the past year, gaining 29.3% versus a gain of 7.2%. Over five years, ADM leads with a +27.2% price change compared with -5.0% for SJM. Archer-Daniels-Midland is the larger company by market cap ($39.74 billion vs $12.76 billion), about 3.1 times the size, while J.M. Smucker is growing revenue faster (+3.7% vs -6.2%).
On valuation, J.M. Smucker trades at a lower forward P/E (10.9x vs 14.4x for Archer-Daniels-Midland). J.M. Smucker offers the higher dividend yield (3.70% vs 2.50%). Archer-Daniels-Midland converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 1.3% versus -1.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ADM | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $82.45 | $119.41 |
| Market cap | $39.74B | $12.76B |
| 1-day change | +1.36% | +3.00% |
| YTD return | +41.49% | +18.53% |
| 1-year return | +29.34% | +7.20% |
| 5-year return | +27.19% | -5.04% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 22.59 | 55.80 |
| Forward P/E | 14.45 | 10.93 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.65 | $2.14 |
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | 3.70% |
| Annual dividend | $2.06 | $4.42 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $80.27B | $9.05B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -6.15% | +3.72% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.08B | $-138.70M |
| Gross margin | 6.27% | 33.53% |
| Operating margin | — | 3.98% |
| Net margin | 1.34% | -1.53% |
| 52-week high | $88.75 | $135.89 |
| 52-week low | $55.58 | $88.25 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -7.10% | -12.13% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -2.49% | +19.03% |
| Average volume | 3.64M | 1.33M |
| Shares outstanding | 481.96M | 106.82M |
| Employees | 40,798 | — |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Archer-Daniels-Midland is about 3.1 times larger than J.M. Smucker by market value ($39.74B vs $12.76B).
- ADM has outperformed SJM by 22.1 percentage points over the past year.
- J.M. Smucker trades at a higher earnings multiple (55.8x vs 22.6x trailing P/E).
- J.M. Smucker offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.70% vs 2.50%).
- J.M. Smucker grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+3.72% vs -6.15%).
About Archer-Daniels-Midland
ADM stock →Archer-Daniels-Midland Company provides human and animal nutrition ingredients and solutions in the United States, Switzerland, the Cayman Islands, Brazil, Mexico, Canada, the United Kingdom, and internationally. It operates in three segments: Ag Services and Oilseeds; Carbohydrate Solutions; and Nutrition.
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · 40,798 employees
About J.M. Smucker
SJM stock →The J. M.
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods
ADM vs SJM FAQ
Which is bigger, Archer-Daniels-Midland or J.M. Smucker?
Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $39.74B compared with $12.76B for J.M. Smucker (SJM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ADM or SJM?
ADM returned +29.34% over the past 12 months, compared with +7.20% for SJM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ADM or SJM?
ADM has the lower trailing P/E at 22.6, versus 55.8 for SJM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Archer-Daniels-Midland or J.M. Smucker?
J.M. Smucker has the higher yield at 3.70%, compared with 2.50% for Archer-Daniels-Midland.
Are Archer-Daniels-Midland and J.M. Smucker in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Staples sector.