MetaCap

Automatic Data Processing (ADP) vs Uber Technologies (UBER)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Automatic Data Processing (ADP) has outperformed Uber Technologies (UBER) over the past year, losing 9.5% versus a loss of 29.9%. Over five years, UBER leads with a +41.9% price change compared with +24.5% for ADP. Uber Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($139.81 billion vs $104.61 billion), about 1.3 times the size.

On valuation, Uber Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (15.5x vs 19.7x for Automatic Data Processing). Automatic Data Processing pays a dividend yielding 2.52%, while Uber Technologies does not currently pay one. Automatic Data Processing converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 20.1% versus 19.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ADP-8.75%UBER-31.46%
+3%-17%-37%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ADP+28.60%UBER+43.62%
+114%+25%-63%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ADP versus UBER key metrics
MetricADPUBER
Share price$264.00$68.45
Market cap$104.61B$139.81B
1-day change+0.63%-0.91%
YTD return+3.07%-16.04%
1-year return-9.50%-29.85%
5-year return+24.48%+41.86%
P/E ratio (TTM)24.1315.01
Forward P/E19.7015.48
EPS (TTM)$10.94$4.56
Dividend yield2.52%0.00%
Annual dividend$6.64$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$21.95B$52.02B
Revenue growth (YoY)+6.74%+18.28%
Net income (latest FY)$4.41B$10.05B
Gross margin46.42%39.75%
Operating margin—10.70%
Net margin20.11%19.33%
52-week high$292.80$100.35
52-week low$188.16$65.41
Distance from 52-week high-9.84%-31.79%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+8.48%+47.35%
Average volume2.25M17.96M
Shares outstanding396.25M2.04B
Employees67,00036,600
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ADP has outperformed UBER by 20.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • Automatic Data Processing trades at a higher earnings multiple (24.1x vs 15.0x trailing P/E).
  • Automatic Data Processing offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.52% vs 0.00%).
  • Uber Technologies grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.28% vs +6.74%).

About Automatic Data Processing

ADP stock →

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. provides cloud-based human capital management (HCM) solutions worldwide.

Technology · Software - Application · 67,000 employees

About Uber Technologies

UBER stock →

Uber Technologies, Inc. develops and operates proprietary technology applications in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.

Technology · Software - Application · 36,600 employees

ADP vs UBER FAQ

Which is bigger, Automatic Data Processing or Uber Technologies?

Uber Technologies (UBER) is larger, with a market capitalization of $139.81B compared with $104.61B for Automatic Data Processing (ADP).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ADP or UBER?

ADP returned -9.50% over the past 12 months, compared with -29.85% for UBER (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ADP or UBER?

UBER has the lower trailing P/E at 15.0, versus 24.1 for ADP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Automatic Data Processing or Uber Technologies?

Automatic Data Processing pays a dividend yielding 2.52%, while Uber Technologies does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Automatic Data Processing and Uber Technologies in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons