Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) vs Uber Technologies (UBER)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) has outperformed Uber Technologies (UBER) over the past year, gaining 4.0% versus a loss of 29.9%. Over five years, CDNS leads with a +130.7% price change compared with +41.9% for UBER. Uber Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($139.81 billion vs $98.07 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Uber Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (15.5x vs 37.2x for Cadence Design Systems). Cadence Design Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 20.9% versus 19.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CDNS | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $356.12 | $68.45 |
| Market cap | $98.07B | $139.81B |
| 1-day change | -0.95% | -0.91% |
| YTD return | +14.99% | -16.04% |
| 1-year return | +4.04% | -29.85% |
| 5-year return | +130.73% | +41.86% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 70.80 | 15.01 |
| Forward P/E | 37.22 | 15.48 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.03 | $4.56 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.30B | $52.02B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +14.12% | +18.28% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.11B | $10.05B |
| Gross margin | — | 39.75% |
| Operating margin | 28.17% | 10.70% |
| Net margin | 20.94% | 19.33% |
| 52-week high | $416.69 | $100.35 |
| 52-week low | $262.75 | $65.41 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.54% | -31.79% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +14.07% | +47.35% |
| Average volume | 2.39M | 17.96M |
| Shares outstanding | 275.39M | 2.04B |
| Employees | 15,445 | 36,600 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CDNS has outperformed UBER by 33.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Cadence Design Systems trades at a higher earnings multiple (70.8x vs 15.0x trailing P/E).
About Cadence Design Systems
CDNS stock →Cadence Design Systems, Inc. develops computational, AI-driven software, hardware, and silicon intellectual property products and solutions.
Technology · Software - Application · 15,445 employees
About Uber Technologies
UBER stock →Uber Technologies, Inc. develops and operates proprietary technology applications in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.
Technology · Software - Application · 36,600 employees
CDNS vs UBER FAQ
Which is bigger, Cadence Design Systems or Uber Technologies?
Uber Technologies (UBER) is larger, with a market capitalization of $139.81B compared with $98.07B for Cadence Design Systems (CDNS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CDNS or UBER?
CDNS returned +4.04% over the past 12 months, compared with -29.85% for UBER (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CDNS or UBER?
UBER has the lower trailing P/E at 15.0, versus 70.8 for CDNS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Cadence Design Systems and Uber Technologies in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector.