abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (AEF) vs PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (AEF) has outperformed PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) over the past year, gaining 45.5% versus a loss of 15.9%. Over five years, PDX leads with a +55.3% price change compared with +12.1% for AEF. PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund is the larger company by market cap ($922.3 million vs $384.5 million), about 2.4 times the size.
On valuation, abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.0x vs 21.7x for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund). abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund pays a dividend yielding 8.34%, while PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AEF | PDX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $9.47 | $20.63 |
| Market cap | $384.50M | $922.30M |
| 1-day change | -1.87% | -1.01% |
| YTD return | +35.29% | +9.85% |
| 1-year return | +45.47% | -15.93% |
| 5-year return | +12.07% | +55.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 2.00 | 21.72 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.74 | $0.95 |
| Dividend yield | 8.34% | 7.68% |
| Annual dividend | $0.79 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $10.14 | $24.44 |
| 52-week low | $6.26 | $18.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -6.61% | -15.59% |
| Average volume | 101.79K | 113.13K |
| Shares outstanding | 40.60M | 44.71M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance/Investors Services | Finance/Investors Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund is about 2.4 times larger than abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund by market value ($922.30M vs $384.50M).
- AEF has outperformed PDX by 61.4 percentage points over the past year.
- PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (21.7x vs 2.0x trailing P/E).
AEF vs PDX FAQ
Which is bigger, abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund or PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund?
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $922.30M compared with $384.50M for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (AEF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AEF or PDX?
AEF returned +45.47% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.93% for PDX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AEF or PDX?
AEF has the lower trailing P/E at 2.0, versus 21.7 for PDX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund or PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund?
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund has the higher yield at 8.34%, compared with 7.68% for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund.
Are abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.