Assurant (AIZ) vs W.R. Berkley (WRB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Assurant (AIZ) has outperformed W.R. Berkley (WRB) over the past year, gaining 23.3% versus a loss of 10.3%. Over five years, WRB leads with a +101.7% price change compared with +64.2% for AIZ. W.R. Berkley is the larger company by market cap ($26.74 billion vs $13.46 billion), about 2.0 times the size, while Assurant is growing revenue faster (+7.9% vs +7.8%).
On valuation, Assurant trades at a lower forward P/E (11.6x vs 14.8x for W.R. Berkley). Assurant offers the higher dividend yield (1.26% vs 0.51%). W.R. Berkley converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.1% versus 6.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AIZ | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $272.88 | $72.04 |
| Market cap | $13.46B | $26.74B |
| 1-day change | +2.30% | +3.31% |
| YTD return | +10.75% | -0.56% |
| 1-year return | +23.32% | -10.34% |
| 5-year return | +64.16% | +101.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 13.06 | 14.79 |
| Forward P/E | 11.64 | 14.76 |
| EPS (TTM) | $20.89 | $4.87 |
| Dividend yield | 1.26% | 0.51% |
| Annual dividend | $3.44 | $0.37 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $12.81B | $14.71B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.89% | +7.84% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $872.70M | $1.78B |
| Net margin | 6.81% | 12.10% |
| 52-week high | $303.94 | $78.96 |
| 52-week low | $206.03 | $62.87 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -10.22% | -8.76% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +19.71% | -4.14% |
| Average volume | 369.66K | 2.50M |
| Shares outstanding | 49.32M | 371.23M |
| Employees | 14,800 | 8,804 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AIZ has outperformed WRB by 33.7 percentage points over the past year.
- W.R. Berkley is more profitable, keeping 12.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.8 cents for Assurant.
About Assurant
AIZ stock →Assurant, Inc. provides protection services to connected devices, homes, and automobiles in North America, Latin America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 14,800 employees
About W.R. Berkley
WRB stock →W. R.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 8,804 employees
AIZ vs WRB FAQ
Which is bigger, Assurant or W.R. Berkley?
W.R. Berkley (WRB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $26.74B compared with $13.46B for Assurant (AIZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AIZ or WRB?
AIZ returned +23.32% over the past 12 months, compared with -10.34% for WRB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AIZ or WRB?
AIZ has the lower trailing P/E at 13.1, versus 14.8 for WRB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Assurant or W.R. Berkley?
Assurant has the higher yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.51% for W.R. Berkley.
Are Assurant and W.R. Berkley in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.