Akamai Technologies (AKAM) vs Maplebear (CART)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Akamai Technologies (AKAM) has outperformed Maplebear (CART) over the past year, gaining 31.5% versus a gain of 16.8%. Akamai Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($14.50 billion vs $10.99 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Maplebear is growing revenue faster (+10.8% vs +5.4%). On valuation, Maplebear trades at a lower forward P/E (9.5x vs 14.7x for Akamai Technologies).
Maplebear converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.9% versus 10.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AKAM | CART |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $100.90 | $46.30 |
| Market cap | $14.50B | $10.99B |
| 1-day change | -3.55% | +2.41% |
| YTD return | +15.64% | +2.93% |
| 1-year return | +31.52% | +16.77% |
| 5-year return | -5.10% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 36.56 | 25.30 |
| Forward P/E | 14.73 | 9.45 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.76 | $1.83 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.21B | $3.74B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.44% | +10.78% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $452.03M | $447.00M |
| Gross margin | 58.95% | 73.70% |
| Operating margin | 13.47% | 13.31% |
| Net margin | 10.74% | 11.95% |
| 52-week high | $165.45 | $52.68 |
| 52-week low | $70.82 | $32.73 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -39.01% | -12.11% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +57.45% | +25.72% |
| Average volume | 4.15M | 4.01M |
| Shares outstanding | 143.72M | 237.33M |
| Employees | 11,000 | 3,600 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AKAM has outperformed CART by 14.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Akamai Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.6x vs 25.3x trailing P/E).
- Maplebear grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+10.78% vs +5.44%).
About Akamai Technologies
AKAM stock →Akamai Technologies, Inc. engages in the provision of security, delivery, and cloud computing solutions in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 11,000 employees
About Maplebear
CART stock →Maplebear Inc., doing business as Instacart, operates as a technology and enablement partner for the grocery industry in the United States and internationally. The company offers Instacart Marketplace which helps retailers serve customers' needs by supporting fulfillment options, shopping occasions, and categories; Instacart Enterprise platform, an end-to-end technology solution for retailers across all aspects of business; and Instacart Ads, enables brands to learn more about general consumer behavior from discovery to purchase, offering insights about how to optimize advertising spend.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 3,600 employees
AKAM vs CART FAQ
Which is bigger, Akamai Technologies or Maplebear?
Akamai Technologies (AKAM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.50B compared with $10.99B for Maplebear (CART).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AKAM or CART?
AKAM returned +31.52% over the past 12 months, compared with +16.77% for CART (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AKAM or CART?
CART has the lower trailing P/E at 25.3, versus 36.6 for AKAM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Akamai Technologies and Maplebear in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.