Akamai Technologies (AKAM) vs Grab (GRAB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Akamai Technologies (AKAM) has outperformed Grab (GRAB) over the past year, gaining 36.6% versus a loss of 50.9%. Over five years, AKAM leads with a -1.6% price change compared with -71.9% for GRAB. Akamai Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($14.81 billion vs $12.67 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Grab is growing revenue faster (+20.5% vs +5.4%).
On valuation, Akamai Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (15.1x vs 22.7x for Grab). Akamai Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.7% versus 8.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AKAM | GRAB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $103.08 | $3.10 |
| Market cap | $14.81B | $12.67B |
| 1-day change | -1.46% | +0.58% |
| YTD return | +19.90% | -38.28% |
| 1-year return | +36.57% | -50.88% |
| 5-year return | -1.61% | -71.87% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 37.35 | 28.16 |
| Forward P/E | 15.05 | 22.70 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.76 | $0.11 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.21B | $3.37B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.44% | +20.49% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $452.03M | $268.00M |
| Gross margin | 58.95% | 43.20% |
| Operating margin | 13.47% | 1.93% |
| Net margin | 10.74% | 7.95% |
| 52-week high | $165.45 | $6.40 |
| 52-week low | $70.82 | $2.74 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.70% | -51.60% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +54.12% | +85.93% |
| Average volume | 4.15M | 54.83M |
| Shares outstanding | 143.72M | 3.97B |
| Employees | 11,000 | 12,012 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AKAM has outperformed GRAB by 87.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Akamai Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (37.3x vs 28.2x trailing P/E).
- Grab grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+20.49% vs +5.44%).
About Akamai Technologies
AKAM stock →Akamai Technologies, Inc. engages in the provision of security, delivery, and cloud computing solutions in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 11,000 employees
About Grab
GRAB stock →Grab Holdings Limited operates the Grab superapp in Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. The company offers delivery services on its platform, such as GrabFood, a food ordering and delivery booking service; Dine-Out for table reservations; GrabMart, a goods ordering and delivery booking service; GrabAds, an online advertising solution; GrabExpress, a package delivery booking service; Grab for Business platform, a unified management portal for corporate clients.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 12,012 employees
AKAM vs GRAB FAQ
Which is bigger, Akamai Technologies or Grab?
Akamai Technologies (AKAM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.81B compared with $12.67B for Grab (GRAB).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AKAM or GRAB?
AKAM returned +36.57% over the past 12 months, compared with -50.88% for GRAB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AKAM or GRAB?
GRAB has the lower trailing P/E at 28.2, versus 37.3 for AKAM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Akamai Technologies and Grab in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.