MetaCap

Albemarle (ALB) vs Sensient Technologies (SXT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Sensient Technologies (SXT) has outperformed Albemarle (ALB) over the past year, gaining 41.1% versus a gain of 11.4%. Over five years, SXT leads with a +37.2% price change compared with -55.4% for ALB. Albemarle is the larger company by market cap ($12.05 billion vs $5.62 billion), about 2.1 times the size, while Sensient Technologies is growing revenue faster (+3.5% vs -4.4%).

On valuation, Albemarle trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 26.4x for Sensient Technologies). Albemarle offers the higher dividend yield (1.59% vs 1.24%). Sensient Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.3% versus -9.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ALB+11.35%SXT+41.09%
+142%+62%-19%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
ALB-52.52%SXT+48.05%
+58%-12%-82%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ALB versus SXT key metrics
MetricALBSXT
Share price$102.10$132.03
Market cap$12.05B$5.62B
1-day change-0.63%+0.02%
YTD return-27.81%+40.53%
1-year return+11.35%+41.09%
5-year return-55.37%+37.20%
P/E ratio (TTM)378.1535.59
Forward P/E9.0426.44
EPS (TTM)$0.27$3.71
Dividend yield1.59%1.24%
Annual dividend$1.62$1.64
Revenue (latest FY)$5.14B$1.61B
Revenue growth (YoY)-4.37%+3.52%
Net income (latest FY)$-510.63M$134.49M
Gross margin13.00%33.45%
Operating margin-7.14%12.85%
Net margin-9.93%8.34%
52-week high$221.00$138.82
52-week low$88.01$82.60
Distance from 52-week high-53.80%-4.89%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+65.09%+9.37%
Average volume2.31M426.21K
Shares outstanding118.01M42.56M
Employees7,8004,070
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryMajor ChemicalsMajor Chemicals

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Albemarle is about 2.1 times larger than Sensient Technologies by market value ($12.05B vs $5.62B).
  • SXT has outperformed ALB by 29.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Albemarle trades at a higher earnings multiple (378.1x vs 35.6x trailing P/E).
  • Sensient Technologies is more profitable, keeping 8.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -9.9 cents for Albemarle.
  • Sensient Technologies grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+3.52% vs -4.37%).

About Albemarle

ALB stock →

Albemarle Corporation provides energy storage solutions worldwide. It operates through three segments: Energy Storage, Specialties, and Ketjen.

Industrials · Major Chemicals · 7,800 employees

About Sensient Technologies

SXT stock →

Sensient Technologies Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets colors, flavors, and other specialty ingredients worldwide. It operates in three segments: Flavors & Extracts, Color, and Asia Pacific.

Industrials · Major Chemicals · 4,070 employees

ALB vs SXT FAQ

Which is bigger, Albemarle or Sensient Technologies?

Albemarle (ALB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.05B compared with $5.62B for Sensient Technologies (SXT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ALB or SXT?

SXT returned +41.09% over the past 12 months, compared with +11.35% for ALB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ALB or SXT?

SXT has the lower trailing P/E at 35.6, versus 378.1 for ALB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Albemarle or Sensient Technologies?

Albemarle has the higher yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.24% for Sensient Technologies.

Are Albemarle and Sensient Technologies in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Major Chemicals industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons