MetaCap

Allison Transmission (ALSN) vs Magna International (MGA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.

Summary

Magna International (MGA) has outperformed Allison Transmission (ALSN) over the past year, gaining 43.7% versus a gain of 35.6%. Over five years, ALSN leads with a +212.9% price change compared with -25.7% for MGA. Magna International is the larger company by market cap ($17.12 billion vs $9.07 billion), about 1.9 times the size.

On valuation, Magna International trades at a lower forward P/E (8.2x vs 9.8x for Allison Transmission). Magna International offers the higher dividend yield (3.08% vs 1.02%). Allison Transmission converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 20.7% versus 2.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ALSN+35.60%MGA+43.67%
+71%+33%-6%
Oct 9, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
ALSN+208.42%MGA-22.89%
+298%+110%-78%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ALSN versus MGA key metrics
MetricALSNMGA
Share price$109.86$63.99
Market cap$9.07B$17.12B
1-day change+0.69%+0.27%
YTD return+12.22%+20.06%
1-year return+35.60%+43.67%
5-year return+212.90%-25.70%
P/E ratio (TTM)17.3623.53
Forward P/E9.768.23
EPS (TTM)$6.33$2.72
Dividend yield1.02%3.08%
Annual dividend$1.12$1.97
Revenue (latest FY)$3.01B$42.01B
Revenue growth (YoY)-6.67%-1.93%
Net income (latest FY)$623.00M$829.00M
Gross margin48.60%14.26%
Operating margin29.24%—
Net margin20.70%1.97%
52-week high$137.62$73.22
52-week low$76.01$43.11
Distance from 52-week high-20.17%-12.61%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+28.10%+14.17%
Average volume813.79K1.18M
Shares outstanding82.58M267.52M
Employees4,000156,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryAuto Parts:O.E.M.Auto Parts:O.E.M.

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Magna International trades at a higher earnings multiple (23.5x vs 17.4x trailing P/E).
  • Magna International offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.08% vs 1.02%).
  • Allison Transmission is more profitable, keeping 20.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.0 cents for Magna International.

About Allison Transmission

ALSN stock →

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and sells fully automatic transmissions for medium- and heavy-duty commercial vehicles and medium- and heavy-tactical U.S. defense vehicles, and electrified propulsion systems worldwide.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 4,000 employees

About Magna International

MGA stock →

Magna International Inc. operates as an automotive supplier in North America, Europe, the Asia Pacific, and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 156,000 employees

ALSN vs MGA FAQ

Which is bigger, Allison Transmission or Magna International?

Magna International (MGA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $17.12B compared with $9.07B for Allison Transmission (ALSN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ALSN or MGA?

MGA returned +43.67% over the past 12 months, compared with +35.60% for ALSN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ALSN or MGA?

ALSN has the lower trailing P/E at 17.4, versus 23.5 for MGA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Allison Transmission or Magna International?

Magna International has the higher yield at 3.08%, compared with 1.02% for Allison Transmission.

Are Allison Transmission and Magna International in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons