MetaCap

Amphenol (APH) vs Coherent (COHR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Coherent (COHR) has outperformed Amphenol (APH) over the past year, gaining 159.1% versus a gain of 35.7%. Over five years, COHR leads with a +425.3% price change compared with +342.8% for APH. Amphenol is the larger company by market cap ($210.40 billion vs $59.21 billion), about 3.6 times the size.

On valuation, Coherent trades at a lower forward P/E (21.5x vs 25.6x for Amphenol). Amphenol pays a dividend yielding 0.54%, while Coherent does not currently pay one. Amphenol converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.5% versus 11.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

APH+35.65%COHR+159.15%
+280%+130%-20%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
APH+350.59%COHR+428.49%
+613%+265%-83%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

APH versus COHR key metrics
MetricAPHCOHR
Share price$85.32$302.35
Market cap$210.40B$59.21B
1-day change-2.55%-9.63%
YTD return+26.27%+63.81%
1-year return+35.65%+159.15%
5-year return+342.82%+425.28%
P/E ratio (TTM)42.6673.39
Forward P/E25.6221.53
EPS (TTM)$2.00$4.12
Dividend yield0.54%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.458$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$23.09B$7.12B
Revenue growth (YoY)+51.71%+22.51%
Net income (latest FY)$4.27B$805.00M
Gross margin36.88%37.50%
Operating margin25.41%—
Net margin18.49%11.31%
52-week high$89.93$440.00
52-week low$59.01$108.19
Distance from 52-week high-5.13%-31.28%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+19.15%+36.44%
Average volume12.37M6.44M
Shares outstanding2.47B195.83M
Employees170,00051,478
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryElectronic ComponentsElectronic Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Amphenol is about 3.6 times larger than Coherent by market value ($210.40B vs $59.21B).
  • COHR has outperformed APH by 123.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Coherent trades at a higher earnings multiple (73.4x vs 42.7x trailing P/E).
  • Amphenol is more profitable, keeping 18.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 11.3 cents for Coherent.
  • Amphenol grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+51.71% vs +22.51%).

About Amphenol

APH stock →

Amphenol Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and markets electrical, electronic, and fiber optic connectors in the United States, China, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Communications Solutions, Harsh Environment Solutions, and Interconnect and Sensor Systems.

Technology · Electronic Components · 170,000 employees

About Coherent

COHR stock →

Coherent Corp. develops, manufactures, and markets lasers, transceivers, other optical and optoelectronic devices, modules, and systems worldwide.

Technology · Electronic Components · 51,478 employees

APH vs COHR FAQ

Which is bigger, Amphenol or Coherent?

Amphenol (APH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $210.40B compared with $59.21B for Coherent (COHR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, APH or COHR?

COHR returned +159.15% over the past 12 months, compared with +35.65% for APH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, APH or COHR?

APH has the lower trailing P/E at 42.7, versus 73.4 for COHR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Amphenol or Coherent?

Amphenol pays a dividend yielding 0.54%, while Coherent does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Amphenol and Coherent in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons