MetaCap

Amphenol (APH) vs Everpure (P)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Everpure (P) has outperformed Amphenol (APH) over the past year, gaining 61.7% versus a gain of 35.7%. Over five years, P leads with a +474.3% price change compared with +342.8% for APH. Amphenol is the larger company by market cap ($210.40 billion vs $50.17 billion), about 4.2 times the size.

On valuation, Amphenol trades at a lower forward P/E (25.6x vs 35.7x for Everpure). Amphenol pays a dividend yielding 0.54%, while Everpure does not currently pay one. Amphenol converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.5% versus 5.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

APH+35.65%P+61.66%
+69%+13%-44%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
APH+350.59%P+493.03%
+519%+238%-42%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

APH versus P key metrics
MetricAPHP
Share price$85.32$150.57
Market cap$210.40B$50.17B
1-day change-2.55%-1.37%
YTD return+26.27%+124.70%
1-year return+35.65%+61.66%
5-year return+342.82%+474.26%
P/E ratio (TTM)42.66206.26
Forward P/E25.6235.67
EPS (TTM)$2.00$0.73
Dividend yield0.54%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.458$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$23.09B$3.66B
Revenue growth (YoY)+51.71%+15.61%
Net income (latest FY)$4.27B$188.18M
Gross margin36.88%70.38%
Operating margin25.41%3.13%
Net margin18.49%5.14%
52-week high$89.93$157.05
52-week low$59.01$56.78
Distance from 52-week high-5.13%-4.13%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+19.15%-3.14%
Average volume12.37M4.59M
Shares outstanding2.47B333.23M
Employees170,0006,400
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryElectrical ProductsElectronic Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Amphenol is about 4.2 times larger than Everpure by market value ($210.40B vs $50.17B).
  • P has outperformed APH by 26.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Everpure trades at a higher earnings multiple (206.3x vs 42.7x trailing P/E).
  • Amphenol is more profitable, keeping 18.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.1 cents for Everpure.
  • Amphenol grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+51.71% vs +15.61%).

About Amphenol

APH stock →

Amphenol Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and markets electrical, electronic, and fiber optic connectors in the United States, China, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Communications Solutions, Harsh Environment Solutions, and Interconnect and Sensor Systems.

Technology · Electrical Products · 170,000 employees

About Everpure

P stock →

Everpure, Inc. provides data storage and management technologies, products, and services in the United States and internationally.

Technology · Electronic Components · 6,400 employees

APH vs P FAQ

Which is bigger, Amphenol or Everpure?

Amphenol (APH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $210.40B compared with $50.17B for Everpure (P).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, APH or P?

P returned +61.66% over the past 12 months, compared with +35.65% for APH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, APH or P?

APH has the lower trailing P/E at 42.7, versus 206.3 for P. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Amphenol or Everpure?

Amphenol pays a dividend yielding 0.54%, while Everpure does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Amphenol and Everpure in the same industry?

Both are in the Technology sector, but in different industries: Electrical Products for Amphenol and Electronic Components for Everpure.

More comparisons