Amphenol (APH) vs Celestica (CLS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Celestica (CLS) has outperformed Amphenol (APH) over the past year, gaining 56.3% versus a gain of 40.6%. Over five years, CLS leads with a +3886.8% price change compared with +354.4% for APH. Amphenol is the larger company by market cap ($215.90 billion vs $46.86 billion), about 4.6 times the size.
On valuation, Celestica trades at a lower forward P/E (18.9x vs 26.4x for Amphenol). Amphenol pays a dividend yielding 0.52%, while Celestica does not currently pay one. Amphenol converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.5% versus 6.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | APH | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $87.55 | $371.57 |
| Market cap | $215.90B | $46.86B |
| 1-day change | -1.21% | -4.29% |
| YTD return | +29.57% | +25.70% |
| 1-year return | +40.61% | +56.26% |
| 5-year return | +354.39% | +3886.80% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 44.22 | 40.30 |
| Forward P/E | 26.39 | 18.91 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.98 | $9.22 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.458 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $23.09B | $12.39B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +51.71% | +28.46% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $4.27B | $832.50M |
| Gross margin | 36.88% | 12.06% |
| Operating margin | 25.41% | 8.40% |
| Net margin | 18.49% | 6.72% |
| 52-week high | $89.93 | $474.03 |
| 52-week low | $59.01 | $238.23 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -2.65% | -21.61% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +15.69% | +27.54% |
| Average volume | 12.40M | 2.52M |
| Shares outstanding | 2.47B | 126.11M |
| Employees | 170,000 | 23,803 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Electrical Products | Electrical Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Amphenol is about 4.6 times larger than Celestica by market value ($215.90B vs $46.86B).
- CLS has outperformed APH by 15.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Amphenol is more profitable, keeping 18.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.7 cents for Celestica.
- Amphenol grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+51.71% vs +28.46%).
About Amphenol
APH stock →Amphenol Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and markets electrical, electronic, and fiber optic connectors in the United States, China, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Communications Solutions, Harsh Environment Solutions, and Interconnect and Sensor Systems.
Technology · Electrical Products · 170,000 employees
About Celestica
CLS stock →Celestica Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides supply chain solutions in Asia, North America, and internationally. It operates through two segments, Advanced Technology Solutions, and Connectivity and Cloud Solutions.
Technology · Electrical Products · 23,803 employees
APH vs CLS FAQ
Which is bigger, Amphenol or Celestica?
Amphenol (APH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $215.90B compared with $46.86B for Celestica (CLS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, APH or CLS?
CLS returned +56.26% over the past 12 months, compared with +40.61% for APH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, APH or CLS?
CLS has the lower trailing P/E at 40.3, versus 44.2 for APH. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Amphenol or Celestica?
Amphenol pays a dividend yielding 0.52%, while Celestica does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Amphenol and Celestica in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Technology sector.