MetaCap

Aptiv (APTV) vs BorgWarner (BWA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

BorgWarner (BWA) has outperformed Aptiv (APTV) over the past year, gaining 47.1% versus a loss of 48.1%. Over five years, BWA leads with a +50.6% price change compared with -73.8% for APTV. BorgWarner is the larger company by market cap ($12.70 billion vs $9.18 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Aptiv is growing revenue faster (+3.5% vs +1.6%).

On valuation, Aptiv trades at a lower forward P/E (6.8x vs 10.5x for BorgWarner). BorgWarner pays a dividend yielding 1.09%, while Aptiv does not currently pay one. BorgWarner converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 1.9% versus 0.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

APTV-48.14%BWA+47.14%
+88%+16%-56%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
APTV-73.22%BWA+51.86%
+89%+4%-81%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

APTV versus BWA key metrics
MetricAPTVBWA
Share price$44.22$62.36
Market cap$9.18B$12.70B
1-day change-1.12%-1.58%
YTD return-41.88%+38.39%
1-year return-48.14%+47.14%
5-year return-73.79%+50.63%
P/E ratio (TTM)44.2231.18
Forward P/E6.7810.53
EPS (TTM)$1.00$2.00
Dividend yield0.00%1.09%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.68
Revenue (latest FY)$20.40B$14.32B
Revenue growth (YoY)+3.47%+1.63%
Net income (latest FY)$165.00M$277.00M
Gross margin19.11%18.68%
Operating margin5.80%3.74%
Net margin0.81%1.93%
52-week high$88.93$78.82
52-week low$42.56$40.50
Distance from 52-week high-50.28%-20.88%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+48.76%+30.32%
Average volume4.03M2.23M
Shares outstanding207.63M203.67M
Employees140,00037,500
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryAuto Parts:O.E.M.Auto Parts:O.E.M.

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • BWA has outperformed APTV by 95.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Aptiv trades at a higher earnings multiple (44.2x vs 31.2x trailing P/E).
  • BorgWarner offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.09% vs 0.00%).

About Aptiv

APTV stock →

Aptiv PLC, an industrial technology company, provides hardware and software solutions to support automotive and other industries in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and South America. It operates through three segments: Advanced Safety and User Experience, Engineered Components, and Electrical Distribution Systems.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 140,000 employees

About BorgWarner

BWA stock →

BorgWarner Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides technology solutions for combustion, hybrid, and electric vehicles worldwide. The company operates through the Turbos & Thermal Technologies; Drivetrain & Morse Systems; PowerDrive Systems; and Battery & Charging Systems segments.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 37,500 employees

APTV vs BWA FAQ

Which is bigger, Aptiv or BorgWarner?

BorgWarner (BWA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.70B compared with $9.18B for Aptiv (APTV).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, APTV or BWA?

BWA returned +47.14% over the past 12 months, compared with -48.14% for APTV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, APTV or BWA?

BWA has the lower trailing P/E at 31.2, versus 44.2 for APTV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Aptiv or BorgWarner?

BorgWarner pays a dividend yielding 1.09%, while Aptiv does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Aptiv and BorgWarner in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons