MetaCap

Aptiv (APTV) vs Garrett Motion (GTX)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Garrett Motion (GTX) has outperformed Aptiv (APTV) over the past year, gaining 98.5% versus a loss of 48.1%. Over five years, GTX leads with a +261.8% price change compared with -73.8% for APTV. Aptiv is the larger company by market cap ($9.18 billion vs $4.82 billion), about 1.9 times the size.

On valuation, Aptiv trades at a lower forward P/E (6.8x vs 11.3x for Garrett Motion). Garrett Motion pays a dividend yielding 1.16%, while Aptiv does not currently pay one. Garrett Motion converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus 0.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

APTV-49.52%GTX+92.34%
+180%+59%-62%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
APTV-73.22%GTX+253.90%
+403%+153%-96%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

APTV versus GTX key metrics
MetricAPTVGTX
Share price$44.22$25.87
Market cap$9.18B$4.82B
1-day change-1.12%-0.84%
YTD return-41.88%+48.42%
1-year return-48.14%+98.54%
5-year return-73.79%+261.82%
P/E ratio (TTM)43.7814.21
Forward P/E6.7811.33
EPS (TTM)$1.01$1.82
Dividend yield0.00%1.16%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.30
Revenue (latest FY)$20.40B$3.58B
Revenue growth (YoY)+3.47%+3.14%
Net income (latest FY)$165.00M$310.00M
Gross margin19.11%20.40%
Operating margin5.80%—
Net margin0.81%8.65%
52-week high$88.93$36.25
52-week low$42.56$12.26
Distance from 52-week high-50.28%-28.63%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+48.76%+39.16%
Average volume4.02M2.47M
Shares outstanding207.63M186.49M
Employees140,0006,300
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryAuto Parts:O.E.M.Auto Parts:O.E.M.

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • GTX has outperformed APTV by 146.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Aptiv trades at a higher earnings multiple (43.8x vs 14.2x trailing P/E).
  • Garrett Motion offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.16% vs 0.00%).
  • Garrett Motion is more profitable, keeping 8.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.8 cents for Aptiv.

About Aptiv

APTV stock →

Aptiv PLC, an industrial technology company, provides hardware and software solutions to support automotive and other industries in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and South America. It operates through three segments: Advanced Safety and User Experience, Engineered Components, and Electrical Distribution Systems.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 140,000 employees

About Garrett Motion

GTX stock →

Garrett Motion Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells turbocharging, air and fluid compression, and high-speed electric motor technologies to original equipment manufacturers and independent aftermarket distributors in the mobility and industrial fields.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 6,300 employees

APTV vs GTX FAQ

Which is bigger, Aptiv or Garrett Motion?

Aptiv (APTV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.18B compared with $4.82B for Garrett Motion (GTX).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, APTV or GTX?

GTX returned +98.54% over the past 12 months, compared with -48.14% for APTV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, APTV or GTX?

GTX has the lower trailing P/E at 14.2, versus 43.8 for APTV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Aptiv or Garrett Motion?

Garrett Motion pays a dividend yielding 1.16%, while Aptiv does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Aptiv and Garrett Motion in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons