MetaCap

Aramark (ARMK) vs Brinker International (EAT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Brinker International (EAT) has outperformed Aramark (ARMK) over the past year, gaining 45.8% versus a gain of 44.4%. Over five years, EAT leads with a +289.8% price change compared with +111.2% for ARMK. Aramark is the larger company by market cap ($14.64 billion vs $7.97 billion), about 1.8 times the size, while Brinker International is growing revenue faster (+7.9% vs +6.4%).

On valuation, Brinker International trades at a lower forward P/E (13.1x vs 19.7x for Aramark). Aramark pays a dividend yielding 0.86%, while Brinker International does not currently pay one. Brinker International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.4% versus 1.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ARMK+44.40%EAT+45.76%
+106%+40%-26%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ARMK+109.89%EAT+276.03%
+422%+173%-77%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ARMK versus EAT key metrics
MetricARMKEAT
Share price$55.54$190.20
Market cap$14.64B$7.97B
1-day change+0.22%+2.64%
YTD return+50.35%+29.12%
1-year return+44.40%+45.76%
5-year return+111.16%+289.80%
P/E ratio (TTM)38.8417.50
Forward P/E19.7513.07
EPS (TTM)$1.43$10.87
Dividend yield0.86%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.48$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$18.51B$5.81B
Revenue growth (YoY)+6.35%+7.86%
Net income (latest FY)$326.39M$487.00M
Gross margin8.36%74.38%
Operating margin4.28%10.67%
Net margin1.76%8.39%
52-week high$62.65$254.99
52-week low$35.07$100.30
Distance from 52-week high-11.35%-25.41%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+23.33%+38.06%
Average volume2.43M1.20M
Shares outstanding263.63M41.88M
Employees278,39020,096
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurants

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Aramark trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.8x vs 17.5x trailing P/E).
  • Brinker International is more profitable, keeping 8.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.8 cents for Aramark.

About Aramark

ARMK stock →

Aramark provides food and facilities services to education, healthcare, business and industry, sports, leisure, and corrections clients in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Food and Support Services United States, and Food and Support Services International.

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 278,390 employees

About Brinker International

EAT stock →

Brinker International, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the ownership, development, operation, and franchise of casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. It operates and franchises Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant brands.

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 20,096 employees

ARMK vs EAT FAQ

Which is bigger, Aramark or Brinker International?

Aramark (ARMK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.64B compared with $7.97B for Brinker International (EAT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ARMK or EAT?

EAT returned +45.76% over the past 12 months, compared with +44.40% for ARMK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ARMK or EAT?

EAT has the lower trailing P/E at 17.5, versus 38.8 for ARMK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Aramark or Brinker International?

Aramark pays a dividend yielding 0.86%, while Brinker International does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Aramark and Brinker International in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons