Aramark (ARMK) vs Yum China (YUMC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Aramark (ARMK) has outperformed Yum China (YUMC) over the past year, gaining 37.8% versus a gain of 1.2%. Over five years, ARMK leads with a +111.6% price change compared with -29.5% for YUMC. Yum China is the larger company by market cap ($14.49 billion vs $14.48 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Aramark is growing revenue faster (+6.4% vs +4.4%).
On valuation, Yum China trades at a lower forward P/E (12.7x vs 19.5x for Aramark). Yum China offers the higher dividend yield (2.47% vs 0.87%). Yum China converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.9% versus 1.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $54.94 | $42.92 |
| Market cap | $14.48B | $14.49B |
| 1-day change | -1.08% | +2.73% |
| YTD return | +49.05% | -10.10% |
| 1-year return | +37.76% | +1.15% |
| 5-year return | +111.62% | -29.48% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 38.96 | 15.27 |
| Forward P/E | 19.54 | 12.70 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.41 | $2.81 |
| Dividend yield | 0.87% | 2.47% |
| Annual dividend | $0.48 | $1.06 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $18.51B | $11.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +6.35% | +4.37% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $326.39M | $929.00M |
| Gross margin | 8.36% | — |
| Operating margin | 4.28% | 10.93% |
| Net margin | 1.76% | 7.87% |
| 52-week high | $62.65 | $58.39 |
| 52-week low | $35.07 | $39.72 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.31% | -26.49% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +24.68% | +44.27% |
| Average volume | 2.42M | 1.52M |
| Shares outstanding | 263.63M | 337.71M |
| Employees | 278,390 | 130,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ARMK has outperformed YUMC by 36.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Aramark trades at a higher earnings multiple (39.0x vs 15.3x trailing P/E).
- Yum China offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.47% vs 0.87%).
- Yum China is more profitable, keeping 7.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.8 cents for Aramark.
About Aramark
ARMK stock →Aramark provides food and facilities services to education, healthcare, business and industry, sports, leisure, and corrections clients in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Food and Support Services United States, and Food and Support Services International.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 278,390 employees
About Yum China
YUMC stock →Yum China Holdings, Inc. owns, operates, and franchises restaurants in the People's Republic of China.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 130,000 employees
ARMK vs YUMC FAQ
Which is bigger, Aramark or Yum China?
Yum China (YUMC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.49B compared with $14.48B for Aramark (ARMK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ARMK or YUMC?
ARMK returned +37.76% over the past 12 months, compared with +1.15% for YUMC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ARMK or YUMC?
YUMC has the lower trailing P/E at 15.3, versus 39.0 for ARMK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Aramark or Yum China?
Yum China has the higher yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.87% for Aramark.
Are Aramark and Yum China in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.