MetaCap

Arrow Electronics (ARW) vs KLA (KLAC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Arrow Electronics (ARW) has outperformed KLA (KLAC) over the past year, gaining 94.0% versus a gain of 81.5%. Over five years, KLAC leads with a +498.1% price change compared with +96.7% for ARW. KLA is the larger company by market cap ($256.72 billion vs $11.54 billion), about 22.2 times the size.

On valuation, Arrow Electronics trades at a lower forward P/E (9.5x vs 29.3x for KLA). KLA pays a dividend yielding 0.41%, while Arrow Electronics does not currently pay one. KLA converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 35.6% versus 1.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ARW+94.03%KLAC+81.45%
+188%+82%-24%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ARW+97.72%KLAC+503.68%
+732%+337%-57%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ARW versus KLAC key metrics
MetricARWKLAC
Share price$226.75$196.72
Market cap$11.54B$256.72B
1-day change-2.26%-0.06%
YTD return+110.56%+61.99%
1-year return+94.03%+81.45%
5-year return+96.73%+498.09%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.5053.75
Forward P/E9.4829.34
EPS (TTM)$15.64$3.66
Dividend yield0.00%0.41%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.80
Revenue (latest FY)$30.85B$13.58B
Revenue growth (YoY)+10.49%+11.71%
Net income (latest FY)$571.27M$4.83B
Gross margin11.24%61.30%
Operating margin2.66%—
Net margin1.85%35.57%
52-week high$249.43$307.37
52-week low$101.79$98.10
Distance from 52-week high-9.09%-36.00%
Analyst consensusnonebuy
Avg. price target upside+3.64%+18.33%
Average volume562.62K10.12M
Shares outstanding50.91M1.31B
Employees22,23017,000
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryElectronic ComponentsElectronic Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • KLA is about 22.2 times larger than Arrow Electronics by market value ($256.72B vs $11.54B).
  • ARW has outperformed KLAC by 12.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • KLA trades at a higher earnings multiple (53.7x vs 14.5x trailing P/E).
  • KLA is more profitable, keeping 35.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.9 cents for Arrow Electronics.

About Arrow Electronics

ARW stock →

Arrow Electronics, Inc. sources and engineers technology for manufacturers, service providers, and users of enterprise computing solutions in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.

Technology · Electronic Components · 22,230 employees

About KLA

KLAC stock →

KLA Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides process control and process-enabling solutions for manufacturing wafers, reticles/masks, chemicals/materials, integrated circuits (ICs), packaged ICs, and printed circuit boards. It operates through three segments: Semiconductor Process Control; Specialty Semiconductor Process; and PCB and Component Inspection.

Technology · Electronic Components · 17,000 employees

ARW vs KLAC FAQ

Which is bigger, Arrow Electronics or KLA?

KLA (KLAC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $256.72B compared with $11.54B for Arrow Electronics (ARW).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ARW or KLAC?

ARW returned +94.03% over the past 12 months, compared with +81.45% for KLAC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ARW or KLAC?

ARW has the lower trailing P/E at 14.5, versus 53.7 for KLAC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Arrow Electronics or KLA?

KLA pays a dividend yielding 0.41%, while Arrow Electronics does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Arrow Electronics and KLA in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons