Axis Capital (AXS) vs CNA Financial (CNA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Axis Capital (AXS) has outperformed CNA Financial (CNA) over the past year, gaining 0.5% versus a loss of 0.1%. Over five years, AXS leads with a +87.7% price change compared with +3.0% for CNA. CNA Financial is the larger company by market cap ($12.54 billion vs $7.08 billion), about 1.8 times the size, while Axis Capital is growing revenue faster (+10.2% vs +5.0%).
On valuation, Axis Capital trades at a lower forward P/E (7.3x vs 9.7x for CNA Financial). CNA Financial offers the higher dividend yield (4.06% vs 1.81%). Axis Capital converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.4% versus 8.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AXS | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $97.02 | $46.35 |
| Market cap | $7.08B | $12.54B |
| 1-day change | -0.49% | -0.74% |
| YTD return | -8.96% | -2.20% |
| 1-year return | +0.52% | -0.11% |
| 5-year return | +87.68% | +2.95% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 6.90 | 10.21 |
| Forward P/E | 7.25 | 9.66 |
| EPS (TTM) | $14.06 | $4.54 |
| Dividend yield | 1.81% | 4.06% |
| Annual dividend | $1.76 | $1.88 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $6.56B | $14.99B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.17% | +5.04% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.01B | $1.28B |
| Net margin | 15.37% | 8.53% |
| 52-week high | $119.99 | $55.71 |
| 52-week low | $88.07 | $41.53 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -19.14% | -16.81% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +26.03% | +5.73% |
| Average volume | 681.59K | 487.76K |
| Shares outstanding | 72.97M | 270.60M |
| Employees | 1,966 | 6,600 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CNA Financial trades at a higher earnings multiple (10.2x vs 6.9x trailing P/E).
- CNA Financial offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.06% vs 1.81%).
- Axis Capital is more profitable, keeping 15.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 8.5 cents for CNA Financial.
- Axis Capital grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+10.17% vs +5.04%).
About Axis Capital
AXS stock →AXIS Capital Holdings Limited, through its subsidiaries, provides various specialty insurance and reinsurance products in Bermuda, the United States, and internationally. The company operates through two segments, Insurance and Reinsurance.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 1,966 employees
About CNA Financial
CNA stock →CNA Financial Corporation, an insurance holding company, primarily provides commercial property and casualty insurance products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, and internationally. It operates through Specialty, Commercial, International, and Life & Group segments.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 6,600 employees
AXS vs CNA FAQ
Which is bigger, Axis Capital or CNA Financial?
CNA Financial (CNA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.54B compared with $7.08B for Axis Capital (AXS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AXS or CNA?
AXS returned +0.52% over the past 12 months, compared with -0.11% for CNA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AXS or CNA?
AXS has the lower trailing P/E at 6.9, versus 10.2 for CNA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Axis Capital or CNA Financial?
CNA Financial has the higher yield at 4.06%, compared with 1.81% for Axis Capital.
Are Axis Capital and CNA Financial in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.