Barrick Mining (B) vs Gold Fields (GFI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Barrick Mining (B) has outperformed Gold Fields (GFI) over the past year, gaining 18.0% versus a loss of 17.4%. Over five years, GFI leads with a +282.7% price change compared with +104.8% for B. Barrick Mining is the larger company by market cap ($65.82 billion vs $31.95 billion), about 2.1 times the size.
On valuation, Gold Fields trades at a lower forward P/E (7.1x vs 9.2x for Barrick Mining). Gold Fields offers the higher dividend yield (5.96% vs 1.63%). Barrick Mining converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 29.4% versus 23.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | B | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $39.99 | $35.86 |
| Market cap | $65.82B | $31.95B |
| 1-day change | +2.07% | +2.31% |
| YTD return | -8.17% | -17.87% |
| 1-year return | +17.96% | -17.35% |
| 5-year return | +104.81% | +282.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.33 | 7.35 |
| Forward P/E | 9.15 | 7.12 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.87 | $4.88 |
| Dividend yield | 1.63% | 5.96% |
| Annual dividend | $0.65 | $2.14 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $16.96B | $5.20B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +31.22% | +15.57% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $4.99B | $1.25B |
| Gross margin | 51.26% | 45.33% |
| Net margin | 29.45% | 23.93% |
| 52-week high | $54.69 | $61.64 |
| 52-week low | $30.35 | $31.11 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -26.88% | -41.82% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +29.28% | +35.72% |
| Average volume | 9.48M | 3.74M |
| Shares outstanding | 1.65B | 890.90M |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Precious Metals | Precious Metals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Barrick Mining is about 2.1 times larger than Gold Fields by market value ($65.82B vs $31.95B).
- B has outperformed GFI by 35.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Barrick Mining trades at a higher earnings multiple (10.3x vs 7.3x trailing P/E).
- Gold Fields offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.96% vs 1.63%).
- Barrick Mining is more profitable, keeping 29.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 23.9 cents for Gold Fields.
- Barrick Mining grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+31.22% vs +15.57%).
About Barrick Mining
B stock →Barrick Mining Corporation engages in the exploration, development, production, and sale of mineral properties. It explores for gold, copper, silver, and energy materials.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
About Gold Fields
GFI stock →Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
B vs GFI FAQ
Which is bigger, Barrick Mining or Gold Fields?
Barrick Mining (B) is larger, with a market capitalization of $65.82B compared with $31.95B for Gold Fields (GFI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, B or GFI?
B returned +17.96% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.35% for GFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, B or GFI?
GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.3, versus 10.3 for B. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Barrick Mining or Gold Fields?
Gold Fields has the higher yield at 5.96%, compared with 1.63% for Barrick Mining.
Are Barrick Mining and Gold Fields in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.