Gold Fields (GFI) vs Pan American Silver (PAAS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Pan American Silver (PAAS) has outperformed Gold Fields (GFI) over the past year, gaining 13.9% versus a loss of 17.4%. Over five years, GFI leads with a +282.7% price change compared with +80.0% for PAAS. Gold Fields is the larger company by market cap ($32.80 billion vs $19.24 billion), about 1.7 times the size, while Pan American Silver is growing revenue faster (+28.4% vs +15.6%).
On valuation, Gold Fields trades at a lower forward P/E (7.3x vs 10.1x for Pan American Silver). Gold Fields offers the higher dividend yield (5.80% vs 1.34%). Pan American Silver converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 27.1% versus 23.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GFI | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $36.82 | $46.41 |
| Market cap | $32.80B | $19.24B |
| 1-day change | +2.66% | +2.42% |
| YTD return | -17.87% | -12.55% |
| 1-year return | -17.35% | +13.87% |
| 5-year return | +282.71% | +80.02% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.54 | 13.73 |
| Forward P/E | 7.31 | 10.12 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.88 | $3.38 |
| Dividend yield | 5.80% | 1.34% |
| Annual dividend | $2.14 | $0.62 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.20B | $3.62B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +15.57% | +28.38% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.25B | $980.00M |
| Gross margin | 45.33% | 38.82% |
| Operating margin | — | 34.07% |
| Net margin | 23.93% | 27.08% |
| 52-week high | $61.64 | $69.99 |
| 52-week low | $31.11 | $33.08 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -40.27% | -33.70% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +32.20% | +39.06% |
| Average volume | 3.74M | 4.02M |
| Shares outstanding | 890.90M | 414.62M |
| Employees | — | 9,348 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Precious Metals | Precious Metals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PAAS has outperformed GFI by 31.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Pan American Silver trades at a higher earnings multiple (13.7x vs 7.5x trailing P/E).
- Gold Fields offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.80% vs 1.34%).
- Pan American Silver grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+28.38% vs +15.57%).
About Gold Fields
GFI stock →Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
About Pan American Silver
PAAS stock →Pan American Silver Corp. engages in the exploration, mine development, extraction, processing, refining, and reclamation of mines in Chile, Peru, Brazil, Mexico, Canada, Argentina, Bolivia, and Guatemala.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals · 9,348 employees
GFI vs PAAS FAQ
Which is bigger, Gold Fields or Pan American Silver?
Gold Fields (GFI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.80B compared with $19.24B for Pan American Silver (PAAS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GFI or PAAS?
PAAS returned +13.87% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.35% for GFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GFI or PAAS?
GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.5, versus 13.7 for PAAS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gold Fields or Pan American Silver?
Gold Fields has the higher yield at 5.80%, compared with 1.34% for Pan American Silver.
Are Gold Fields and Pan American Silver in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.