MetaCap

Alibaba Group (BABA) vs Vipshop (VIPS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Vipshop (VIPS) has outperformed Alibaba Group (BABA) over the past year, losing 37.1% versus a loss of 39.7%. Over five years, VIPS leads with a +11.2% price change compared with -35.0% for BABA. Alibaba Group is the larger company by market cap ($266.19 billion vs $6.07 billion), about 43.8 times the size.

On valuation, Vipshop trades at a lower forward P/E (5.1x vs 11.6x for Alibaba Group). Alibaba Group pays a dividend yielding 6.77%, while Vipshop does not currently pay one. Alibaba Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.1% versus 6.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BABA-39.75%VIPS-37.13%
+3%-23%-50%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 6, 2026
BABA-32.36%VIPS+12.83%
+87%+10%-68%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BABA versus VIPS key metrics
MetricBABAVIPS
Share price$107.00$12.77
Market cap$266.19B$6.07B
1-day change-2.07%+0.16%
YTD return-25.46%-27.93%
1-year return-39.75%-37.13%
5-year return-34.96%+11.16%
P/E ratio (TTM)25.914.30
Forward P/E11.595.08
EPS (TTM)$4.13$2.97
Dividend yield6.77%4.86%
Annual dividend$7.24$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$148.40B$15.15B
Revenue growth (YoY)+8.09%+1.97%
Net income (latest FY)$15.02B$1.04B
Gross margin39.81%23.12%
Operating margin4.90%7.68%
Net margin10.12%6.84%
52-week high$182.50$20.59
52-week low$91.99$12.02
Distance from 52-week high-41.37%-37.98%
Analyst consensusstrong_buyhold
Avg. price target upside+73.35%+30.78%
Average volume10.51M2.59M
Shares outstanding2.49B397.70M
Employees132,16515,145
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryInternet RetailInternet Retail

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Alibaba Group is about 43.8 times larger than Vipshop by market value ($266.19B vs $6.07B).
  • Alibaba Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (25.9x vs 4.3x trailing P/E).
  • Alibaba Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.77% vs 4.86%).
  • Alibaba Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.09% vs +1.97%).

About Alibaba Group

BABA stock →

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, through its subsidiaries, provides technology infrastructure and marketing reach to help merchants, brands, retailers, and other businesses in the People's Republic of China and internationally. It operates through the Alibaba China E-Commerce Group, Alibaba International Digital Commerce Group, Cloud Intelligence Group, and All Others segments.

Consumer Cyclical · Internet Retail · 132,165 employees

About Vipshop

VIPS stock →

Vipshop Holdings Limited operates online platforms in the People's Republic of China. The company operates through Vip.com, Shan Shan Outlets, and Others segments.

Consumer Cyclical · Internet Retail · 15,145 employees

BABA vs VIPS FAQ

Which is bigger, Alibaba Group or Vipshop?

Alibaba Group (BABA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $266.19B compared with $6.07B for Vipshop (VIPS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BABA or VIPS?

VIPS returned -37.13% over the past 12 months, compared with -39.75% for BABA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BABA or VIPS?

VIPS has the lower trailing P/E at 4.3, versus 25.9 for BABA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Alibaba Group or Vipshop?

Alibaba Group has the higher yield at 6.77%, compared with 4.86% for Vipshop.

Are Alibaba Group and Vipshop in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Internet Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector.

More comparisons