MetaCap

BCE (BCE) vs Fabrinet (FN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Fabrinet (FN) has outperformed BCE (BCE) over the past year, gaining 34.5% versus a loss of 15.2%. Over five years, FN leads with a +407.2% price change compared with -61.5% for BCE. BCE is the larger company by market cap ($18.60 billion vs $17.47 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, BCE trades at a lower forward P/E (10.7x vs 22.4x for Fabrinet). BCE pays a dividend yielding 8.78%, while Fabrinet does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BCE-15.16%FN+34.53%
+108%+43%-21%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
BCE-61.01%FN+393.35%
+649%+277%-95%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BCE versus FN key metrics
MetricBCEFN
Share price$19.94$487.40
Market cap$18.60B$17.47B
1-day change+0.92%-2.13%
YTD return-17.04%+9.38%
1-year return-15.16%+34.53%
5-year return-61.54%+407.22%
P/E ratio (TTM)4.0937.35
Forward P/E10.7222.37
EPS (TTM)$4.88$13.05
Dividend yield8.78%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.75$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)—$4.64B
Revenue growth (YoY)—+35.73%
Net income (latest FY)—$473.03M
Gross margin—11.99%
Operating margin—9.97%
Net margin—10.19%
52-week high$26.52$748.89
52-week low$19.52$361.19
Distance from 52-week high-24.81%-34.92%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+33.39%+50.62%
Average volume3.88M867.13K
Shares outstanding932.53M35.83M
Employees38,68321,521
SectorTelecommunicationsUtilities
IndustryTelecommunications EquipmentTelecommunications Equipment

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • FN has outperformed BCE by 49.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Fabrinet trades at a higher earnings multiple (37.3x vs 4.1x trailing P/E).
  • BCE offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.78% vs 0.00%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: BCE in Telecommunications and Fabrinet in Utilities.

About BCE

BCE stock →

BCE Inc., a communications company, provides wireless, wireline, internet, streaming services, and television (TV) services to residential, business, and wholesale customers in Canada. The company operates through three segments: Bell Communication and Technology Services Canada, Bell Communication and Technology Services United States, and Bell Media.

Telecommunications · Telecommunications Equipment · 38,683 employees

About Fabrinet

FN stock →

Fabrinet provides optical packaging and precision optical, electro-mechanical, and electronic manufacturing services in North America, the Asia-Pacific, Europe, and internationally. The company offers a range of advanced optical and electro-mechanical capabilities in the manufacturing process, including process design and engineering, supply chain management, manufacturing, printed circuit board assembly, packaging, integration, final assembly, and testing.

Utilities · Telecommunications Equipment · 21,521 employees

BCE vs FN FAQ

Which is bigger, BCE or Fabrinet?

BCE (BCE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $18.60B compared with $17.47B for Fabrinet (FN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BCE or FN?

FN returned +34.53% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.16% for BCE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BCE or FN?

BCE has the lower trailing P/E at 4.1, versus 37.3 for FN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCE or Fabrinet?

BCE pays a dividend yielding 8.78%, while Fabrinet does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are BCE and Fabrinet in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Telecommunications Equipment industry within the Telecommunications sector.

More comparisons