MetaCap

Saul Centers (BFS) vs Kite Realty Group (KRG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.

Summary

Kite Realty Group (KRG) has outperformed Saul Centers (BFS) over the past year, gaining 8.8% versus a loss of 1.9%. Over five years, KRG leads with a +9.4% price change compared with -34.6% for BFS. Kite Realty Group is the larger company by market cap ($4.91 billion vs $1.04 billion), about 4.7 times the size, while Saul Centers is growing revenue faster (+7.8% vs +0.8%).

On valuation, Kite Realty Group trades at a lower trailing P/E (15.0x vs 30.3x for Saul Centers). Saul Centers offers the higher dividend yield (7.87% vs 4.77%). Kite Realty Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 35.4% versus 12.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BFS-1.93%KRG+8.78%
+38%+16%-5%
Oct 9, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
BFS-35.09%KRG+10.29%
+40%+0%-40%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BFS versus KRG key metrics
MetricBFSKRG
Share price$30.00$23.91
Market cap$1.04B$4.91B
1-day change+0.94%+0.50%
YTD return-4.85%-0.25%
1-year return-1.93%+8.78%
5-year return-34.63%+9.43%
P/E ratio (TTM)30.3015.04
Forward P/E—70.32
EPS (TTM)$0.99$1.59
Dividend yield7.87%4.77%
Annual dividend$2.36$1.14
Revenue (latest FY)$289.84M$844.37M
Revenue growth (YoY)+7.81%+0.82%
Net income (latest FY)$37.51M$298.66M
Operating margin67.39%—
Net margin12.94%35.37%
52-week high$38.42$29.92
52-week low$29.16$21.38
Distance from 52-week high-21.92%-20.09%
Analyst consensusnonehold
Avg. price target upside+43.33%+25.47%
Average volume116.44K2.39M
Shares outstanding24.72M200.35M
Employees156228
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Kite Realty Group is about 4.7 times larger than Saul Centers by market value ($4.91B vs $1.04B).
  • KRG has outperformed BFS by 10.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Saul Centers trades at a higher earnings multiple (30.3x vs 15.0x trailing P/E).
  • Saul Centers offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (7.87% vs 4.77%).
  • Kite Realty Group is more profitable, keeping 35.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 12.9 cents for Saul Centers.
  • Saul Centers grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.81% vs +0.82%).

About Saul Centers

BFS stock →

Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-managed, self-administered equity REIT.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 156 employees

About Kite Realty Group

KRG stock →

Kite Realty Group Trust is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns and operates a high-quality portfolio of open-air shopping centers and mixed-use destinations. The Company's portfolio is concentrated in high-growth Sun Belt and select strategic gateway markets.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 228 employees

BFS vs KRG FAQ

Which is bigger, Saul Centers or Kite Realty Group?

Kite Realty Group (KRG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.91B compared with $1.04B for Saul Centers (BFS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BFS or KRG?

KRG returned +8.78% over the past 12 months, compared with -1.93% for BFS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BFS or KRG?

KRG has the lower trailing P/E at 15.0, versus 30.3 for BFS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Saul Centers or Kite Realty Group?

Saul Centers has the higher yield at 7.87%, compared with 4.77% for Kite Realty Group.

Are Saul Centers and Kite Realty Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons