Bilibili (BILI) vs Science Applications International (SAIC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Science Applications International (SAIC) has outperformed Bilibili (BILI) over the past year, gaining 20.6% versus a loss of 46.3%. Over five years, SAIC leads with a +35.4% price change compared with -78.7% for BILI. Bilibili is the larger company by market cap ($6.04 billion vs $5.29 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Science Applications International trades at a lower forward P/E (11.0x vs 11.4x for Bilibili). Science Applications International pays a dividend yielding 1.17%, while Bilibili does not currently pay one. Science Applications International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.9% versus 3.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BILI | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.65 | $126.20 |
| Market cap | $6.04B | $5.29B |
| 1-day change | -1.80% | +3.37% |
| YTD return | -39.32% | +21.28% |
| 1-year return | -46.25% | +20.61% |
| 5-year return | -78.71% | +35.40% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 28.73 | 14.73 |
| Forward P/E | 11.37 | 10.99 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.51 | $8.57 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.48 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.34B | $7.26B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.06% | -2.90% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $170.67M | $358.00M |
| Gross margin | 36.62% | 12.01% |
| Operating margin | 3.71% | 7.17% |
| Net margin | 3.93% | 4.93% |
| 52-week high | $36.40 | $142.66 |
| 52-week low | $14.32 | $81.08 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -59.75% | -11.54% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +80.66% | +5.15% |
| Average volume | 2.82M | 442.53K |
| Shares outstanding | 332.23M | 41.90M |
| Employees | 8,287 | 23,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | EDP Services | EDP Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SAIC has outperformed BILI by 66.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Bilibili trades at a higher earnings multiple (28.7x vs 14.7x trailing P/E).
- Science Applications International offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.17% vs 0.00%).
- Bilibili grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.06% vs -2.90%).
About Bilibili
BILI stock →Bilibili Inc. provides online entertainment services for the young generations in the People's Republic of China.
Technology · EDP Services · 8,287 employees
About Science Applications International
SAIC stock →Science Applications International Corporation provides technical, engineering, and mission and enterprise information technology (IT) services in the United States. It operates through two segments, Defense and Intelligence; and Civilian.
Technology · EDP Services · 23,000 employees
BILI vs SAIC FAQ
Which is bigger, Bilibili or Science Applications International?
Bilibili (BILI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.04B compared with $5.29B for Science Applications International (SAIC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BILI or SAIC?
SAIC returned +20.61% over the past 12 months, compared with -46.25% for BILI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BILI or SAIC?
SAIC has the lower trailing P/E at 14.7, versus 28.7 for BILI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Bilibili or Science Applications International?
Science Applications International pays a dividend yielding 1.17%, while Bilibili does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Bilibili and Science Applications International in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the EDP Services industry within the Technology sector.