MetaCap

Science Applications International (SAIC) vs Waystar (WAY)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Science Applications International (SAIC) has outperformed Waystar (WAY) over the past year, gaining 20.6% versus a loss of 32.0%. Science Applications International is the larger company by market cap ($5.11 billion vs $4.94 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Waystar is growing revenue faster (+16.5% vs -2.9%). On valuation, Science Applications International trades at a lower forward P/E (10.6x vs 13.7x for Waystar).

Science Applications International pays a dividend yielding 1.21%, while Waystar does not currently pay one. Waystar converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.2% versus 4.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

SAIC+20.61%WAY-32.02%
+36%-11%-59%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
SAIC+5.51%WAY+24.49%
+126%+46%-34%
Jun 3, 20245 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

SAIC versus WAY key metrics
MetricSAICWAY
Share price$122.08$25.77
Market cap$5.11B$4.94B
1-day change-2.01%-2.39%
YTD return+21.28%-21.31%
1-year return+20.61%-32.02%
5-year return+35.40%—
P/E ratio (TTM)14.2537.90
Forward P/E10.6313.71
EPS (TTM)$8.57$0.68
Dividend yield1.21%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.48$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$7.26B$1.10B
Revenue growth (YoY)-2.90%+16.50%
Net income (latest FY)$358.00M$112.09M
Gross margin12.01%68.33%
Operating margin7.17%22.68%
Net margin4.93%10.20%
52-week high$142.66$40.35
52-week low$81.08$17.26
Distance from 52-week high-14.43%-36.13%
Analyst consensusholdstrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+8.70%+31.04%
Average volume443.21K2.46M
Shares outstanding41.90M191.75M
Employees23,0001,700
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryEDP ServicesEDP Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • SAIC has outperformed WAY by 52.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • Waystar trades at a higher earnings multiple (37.9x vs 14.2x trailing P/E).
  • Science Applications International offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.21% vs 0.00%).
  • Waystar is more profitable, keeping 10.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 4.9 cents for Science Applications International.
  • Waystar grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+16.50% vs -2.90%).

About Science Applications International

SAIC stock →

Science Applications International Corporation provides technical, engineering, and mission and enterprise information technology (IT) services in the United States. It operates through two segments, Defense and Intelligence; and Civilian.

Technology · EDP Services · 23,000 employees

About Waystar

WAY stock →

Waystar Holding Corp. develops a cloud-based software solution for healthcare payments.

Technology · EDP Services · 1,700 employees

SAIC vs WAY FAQ

Which is bigger, Science Applications International or Waystar?

Science Applications International (SAIC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.11B compared with $4.94B for Waystar (WAY).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, SAIC or WAY?

SAIC returned +20.61% over the past 12 months, compared with -32.02% for WAY (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, SAIC or WAY?

SAIC has the lower trailing P/E at 14.2, versus 37.9 for WAY. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Science Applications International or Waystar?

Science Applications International pays a dividend yielding 1.21%, while Waystar does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Science Applications International and Waystar in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the EDP Services industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons