MetaCap

Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO.B) vs TransMedics Group (TMDX)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO.B) has outperformed TransMedics Group (TMDX) over the past year, gaining 28.2% versus a loss of 33.1%. Over five years, TMDX leads with a +197.6% price change compared with -50.5% for BIO.B. Bio-Rad Laboratories is the larger company by market cap ($9.76 billion vs $2.74 billion), about 3.6 times the size, while TransMedics Group is growing revenue faster (+37.1% vs +0.7%).

On valuation, TransMedics Group trades at a lower trailing P/E (20.5x vs 46.3x for Bio-Rad Laboratories). TransMedics Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 31.4% versus 29.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BIO.B+28.15%TMDX-32.00%
+32%-10%-51%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 6, 2026
BIO.B-50.54%TMDX+188.32%
+572%+236%-100%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BIO.B versus TMDX key metrics
MetricBIO.BTMDX
Share price$365.08$79.00
Market cap$9.76B$2.74B
1-day change0.00%-2.55%
YTD return+17.50%-35.06%
1-year return+28.15%-33.08%
5-year return-50.54%+197.55%
P/E ratio (TTM)46.2720.47
Forward P/E—35.05
EPS (TTM)$7.89$3.86
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$2.58B$605.49M
Revenue growth (YoY)+0.65%+37.13%
Net income (latest FY)$759.90M$190.29M
Gross margin51.87%59.92%
Operating margin1.83%17.93%
Net margin29.42%31.43%
52-week high$365.08$156.00
52-week low$244.54$60.11
Distance from 52-week high0.00%-49.36%
Analyst consensus—buy
Avg. price target upside—+26.35%
Average volume6820.41K
Shares outstanding5.06M34.68M
Employees7,450898
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical DevicesMedical Devices

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Bio-Rad Laboratories is about 3.6 times larger than TransMedics Group by market value ($9.76B vs $2.74B).
  • BIO.B has outperformed TMDX by 61.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories trades at a higher earnings multiple (46.3x vs 20.5x trailing P/E).
  • TransMedics Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+37.13% vs +0.65%).

About Bio-Rad Laboratories

BIO.B stock →

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. develops, manufactures, and distributes life science research and clinical diagnostic products in the United States, Europe, Asia, Canada, Latin America, and internationally.

Healthcare · Medical Devices · 7,450 employees

About TransMedics Group

TMDX stock →

TransMedics Group, Inc., a commercial-stage medical technology company, engages in transforming organ transplant therapy for end-stage organ failure patients in the United States and internationally. The company provides Organ Care System (OCS), a portable organ perfusion, optimization, and monitoring system that utilizes its proprietary and customized technology to replicate near-physiologic conditions for donor organs outside of the human body.

Healthcare · Medical Devices · 898 employees

BIO.B vs TMDX FAQ

Which is bigger, Bio-Rad Laboratories or TransMedics Group?

Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO.B) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.76B compared with $2.74B for TransMedics Group (TMDX).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BIO.B or TMDX?

BIO.B returned +28.15% over the past 12 months, compared with -33.08% for TMDX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BIO.B or TMDX?

TMDX has the lower trailing P/E at 20.5, versus 46.3 for BIO.B. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are Bio-Rad Laboratories and TransMedics Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Medical Devices industry within the Healthcare sector.

More comparisons